10.7/10.9 INDI SOLUTIONS

Post by **rdg281** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:10 pm

Ciao Milanese,

is it possible to send or make one undressed version of the 10.9
If it's possible just de red weekly stoch/line without the interference/ caculation of the other stoch lines.
So Just the red one, that it does what it does now on the daily tf
Would be great

Thanks in advance

Post by **milanese** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:14 pm

rdg281 » Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:10 pm wrote:Ciao Milanese,

is it possible to send or make one undressed version of the 10.9
If it's possible just de red weekly stoch/line without the interference/ caculation of the other stoch lines.
So Just the red one, that it does what it does now on the daily tf
Would be great

Thanks in advance

You can set ShowDaily2_1 to true, so you have too a yellow line showing you the daily 2.1 stoch.

Cheers

Tommaso

Post by **rdg281** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:23 pm

milanese » Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:14 pm wrote:
rdg281 » Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:10 pm wrote:Ciao Milanese,

is it possible to send or make one undressed version of the 10.9
If it's possible just de red weekly stoch/line without the interference/ caculation of the other stoch lines.
So Just the red one, that it does what it does now on the daily tf
Would be great

Thanks in advance
You can set ShowDaily2_1 to true, so you have too a yellow line showing you the daily 2.1 stoch.

Cheers

Tommaso

That i know amico,

What i mean is that i would like just the red line as indicator without the other stuff.
I want to try somthing in a simple ea but its giving me false signals because the other code is disturbing.
i only need the weekly as indicator for know.

Manualy the system is perfect till now
but i have a little idea that i want try out

thanks for your answer

cheers

Roberto

Post by **milanese** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:43 pm

rdg281 » Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:23 pm wrote:
That i know amico,
What i mean is that i would like just the red line as indicator without the other stuff.
I want to try somthing in a simple ea but its giving me false signals because the other code is disturbing.
i only need the weekly as indicator for know.

Manualy the system is perfect till now
but i have a little idea that i want try out

thanks for your answer

cheers

Roberto

This is a W1 Stoch 2.1.1 you can use the standart stoch indicator for this, just setting at the values in the 10.9 indicator used..

Cheers

Tommaso

Post by **rdg281** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:51 pm

That simple pffff

Great

thanks :hi:

cheers

Roberto

4Trader · Post by **4Trader** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:41 pm

I seem to be having a problem with the 10.6 Market Info V_3.1 indicator since the beginning of this week. It's no longer showing the Swap values. Both swap long and swap short are showing zeros.

I'm with FXCM UK. Build 625.

Has anyone seen this problem before ?

Thanks

Post by **milanese** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:50 pm

4Trader » Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:41 pm wrote:I seem to be having a problem with the 10.6 Market Info V_3.1 indicator since the beginning of this week. It's no longer showing the Swap values. Both swap long and swap short are showing zeros.

I'm with FXCM UK. Build 625.

Has anyone seen this problem before ?

Thanks

Must be a broker issue..

Cheers

Tommaso

Swingtraderkk · Post by **Swingtraderkk** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 5:26 pm

Hi Tommaso,

I've been wondering about the stochs, they never looked to me as if they behaved like stochs I'm used to. See below for difference to standard stoch.

Standard settings alone are not doing it.

Looking at the code can you explain the impact of :

1) Moving Average method. Exactly how is Smoothed averaging MODE_SMMA calculated? and it shouldn't matter if you are using %K as the output correct?

2) Price field parameter. Can be one of these values: 0 - Low/High or 1 - Close/Close. How does this affect the formula below:

The formula for %K is:

%K = (CLOSE-LOW(%K))/(HIGH(%K)-LOW(%K))*100
Where:
CLOSE — is today’s closing price;
LOW(%K) — is the lowest low in %K periods;
HIGH(%K) — is the highest high in %K periods.

3) Indicator line index. It can be any of the Indicators line identifiers enumeration value (0 - MODE_MAIN, 1 - MODE_SIGNAL). I assume it is taking the %K value?

Post by **milanese** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 5:32 pm

Swingtraderkk » Thu Apr 10, 2014 5:26 pm wrote:Hi Tommaso,

I've been wondering about the stochs, they never looked to me as if they behaved like stochs I'm used to. See below for difference to standard stoch.

Standard settings alone are not doing it.

Looking at the code can you explain the impact of :

1) Moving Average method. Exactly how is Smoothed averaging MODE_SMMA calculated? and it shouldn't matter if you are using %K as the output correct?

2) Price field parameter. Can be one of these values: 0 - Low/High or 1 - Close/Close. How does this affect the formula below:

The formula for %K is:

%K = (CLOSE-LOW(%K))/(HIGH(%K)-LOW(%K))*100
Where:
CLOSE — is today’s closing price;
LOW(%K) — is the lowest low in %K periods;
HIGH(%K) — is the highest high in %K periods.
3) Indicator line index. It can be any of the Indicators line identifiers enumeration value (0 - MODE_MAIN, 1 - MODE_SIGNAL). I assume it is taking the %K value?

Look here http://ta.mql4.com/indicators/oscillators/stochastic this explains you the caculations for the stochastic indicator used in Empty4 , and the formula self gives you an expalin how changing the parameters effect the stochastic- caculation.. for better understanding this you can play with different settings from the stochastic indicator and watch the effect..

Cheers

Tommaso

Swingtraderkk · Post by **Swingtraderkk** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 5:46 pm

Thanks Tommaso,

I had already read that and it is exactly as I understood stochs were calculated, but I am trying to replicate the stoch in another platform, and I am not that familiar with Empty4.

so what does the price field mean Close-Close as opposed to high to Low? Is the stoch taking the highest close vs lowest close as opposed to the highest high vs. the lowest low?

I am pretty sure that you are using the %K output so the ssma doesn't matter?

Is this correct?