jb68 wrote: @gaheitman if Empty4 require nested "if", then it should have the worst compiler and optimization ever. Any language I know has optimization and would transform if (A && B) to a nested if and will return false at first false statement to take less cpu. However here things are different, some will execute the first on the right, others the first on left. I don't have that much mql4 experience to know how Empty4 works.

jb68 wrote:I don't have that much mql4 experience to know how Empty4 works.

fx8000 wrote:Hi all,

Many thanks to Steve and many others who have contributed to the development of this EA.

It is early days yet and I am not getting too excited about the results. The demo has only been running for just over a week and has chalked up 13% gains.

Demo FXDD GMT+2 $10,000 account, H4 charts, 15 pairs, lot size 0.2, OOTB RSI Forexkiwi 500.

Initially, I was manually closing all trades when the daily gains were exceeding 3% of equity. However, since yesterday, I have started running Donefortheday EA from Changethecolor thread to do this automatically.

Will post again in a couple of weeks. It will be interesting to see how the bot progresses.

Cheers,
Peter

SteveHopwood wrote:Latest update in post 1. This is no biggy, as it merely deals with the problem discussed above. If you never noticed the error, or couldn't care less, then you do not need the update.

fx8000 wrote:Graeme continues to surprise on the upside. Added another 3% to the account balance so far this week.

fx8000 wrote:

fx8000 wrote:Graeme continues to surprise on the upside. Added another 3% to the account balance so far this week.

Graeme gave back its gains for the week on Thursday, an interest setting day for the UK and Europe. Would we be trading real money on an interest setting day ? I doubt it.

Yesterday, G suffered a hugh draw down of 6.8% during a choppy session. You can see from the account history that four yen pairs were involved. There is a lesson to be learned here. The default settings for Zeljko was false, and has now been changed to true to avoid such a catatrophy happening again.

It will be interesting to see what happens next week.

Cheers,
Peter

fx8000 wrote:
Graeme gave back its gains for the week on Thursday, an interest setting day for the UK and Europe. Would we be trading real money on an interest setting day ? I doubt it.

Yesterday, G suffered a hugh draw down of 6.8% during a choppy session. You can see from the account history that four yen pairs were involved. There is a lesson to be learned here. The default settings for Zeljko was false, and has now been changed to true to avoid such a catatrophy happening again.

It will be interesting to see what happens next week.

Cheers,
Peter

Gamma_gallus wrote:

fx8000 wrote:
Graeme gave back its gains for the week on Thursday, an interest setting day for the UK and Europe. Would we be trading real money on an interest setting day ? I doubt it.

Yesterday, G suffered a hugh draw down of 6.8% during a choppy session. You can see from the account history that four yen pairs were involved. There is a lesson to be learned here. The default settings for Zeljko was false, and has now been changed to true to avoid such a catatrophy happening again.

It will be interesting to see what happens next week.

Cheers,
Peter

From my side, since I've put the last version, G behaves nicely ! I didn't face your situation on jpy, probably, as you mention, because I've set up from the beg. the Zeljko input to true. So we can notice the importance of it !

Edit: do not pay attention to my signature results, the bloody update doesn't work consistently (weird) .. last update was on tuesday 7 (right before I set up the last version ..)

Olivier