| stevehopwoodforex.com https://www.stevehopwoodforex.com/phpBB3/ Print view |
|
| Bob and Shelley Again https://www.stevehopwoodforex.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=2759 |
Page 11 of 120 |
| Author: | SteveHopwood [ Tue Aug 06, 2013 9:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bob and Shelley Again |
Well, if a trade taken on one candle is closed on the same candle then the conditions are correct for a re-entry again because they were correct for the first trade. This means the bot will take a second trade. 4 hours is quite a long time so it is perfectly possible for this to happen. An EA does what it is coded to do. You want it to do something different, you have to tell me to tell it what is different. EA's are not mind-readers. Nor am I. |
|
| Author: | SteveHopwood [ Tue Aug 06, 2013 11:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bob and Shelley Again |
I have some very sickly trades still open and heading rapidly towards SL - live trading but tiny lots and not much money involved. I am going to leave this running live until the end of the week to see if it can make up some lost ground (and take the hit if not), then knock off for August and just run on demo. I have an update coming tomorrow with some stacking ideas. I had intended adding Andy's ideas tonight as an option, but some now-deleted local difficulties distracted my attention. More tomorrow if I am in the mood, or Thurs if not. Have fun. |
|
| Author: | forex.rapheal [ Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bob and Shelley Again |
Dear all, Can we add an option to change the fixed TP and SL. Infact I love the idea from Bunker about "strench slope". Can we put them together? http://www.stevehopwoodforex.com/phpBB3 ... f=44&t=716 Regards, |
|
| Author: | fxozgirl [ Wed Aug 07, 2013 11:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bob and Shelley Again |
Ok, fair call I thought I had specified that for re-entry trades, but looking back I hadn't... So, can we have it so it only trades once per candle? and there has to be a close above/below 60 lwma to validate the set up. Main entry's all look to be good |
|
| Author: | fxozgirl [ Wed Aug 07, 2013 11:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bob and Shelley Again |
I have just set up a 2nd demo using mptm to manage SL using 2 x ADR..this may prove to be more suitable than a fixed SL |
|
| Author: | fxozgirl [ Wed Aug 07, 2013 11:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bob and Shelley Again |
Looking forward to your stacking ideas Steve Here's my current open trades...the account is down a bit, but most of that is caused by incorrect entries. The other thing I've noticed is that most of the trades that did hit SL were virtually at the peak of their drawdown and then reversed back into the direction of the trend...perhaps signifying the stop is too close. For further testing and comparison I have set up a 2nd demo using 2 x ADR as the SL to see if this works better. I will do a bit more analysis of trades over the weekend. |
|
| Author: | SteveHopwood [ Wed Aug 07, 2013 3:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bob and Shelley Again |
V 1g is in post 1.
|
|
| Author: | OldTrader [ Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bob and Shelley Again |
So now there does need to be close above/below lwma for reentry? |
|
| Author: | MrLong [ Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bob and Shelley Again |
Hi Steve, The Ma's I actually use for the stack are the 21 EMA and 55 EMA: Code: Select all Code: Select all Andy |
|
| Author: | SteveHopwood [ Wed Aug 07, 2013 8:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bob and Shelley Again |
I can add stacking moving average inputs as user choices. Why these particular ones? The second bit does not unless I am right in this: you use Lib.CSS to find the values of cssLongH1 and cssShortH1? And that the two variables are those that you have defined elsewhere in your code? Actually, now I read it after posting, the makes no sense. Nope, not a clue what you mean. |
|
| All times are UTC | Page 11 of 120 |
|
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited |
|