minaz » Thu Aug 18, 2016 3:53 pm wrote:Dear joe,


i had two setup BB v 1s with amazon VPS from 16/08/2016

the one with name 'BB-mm' is the billy bot only

with steve M5 set file

https://myfxbook.com/members/minazri/bb-mm/1746085

the other name with 'combo' is your combo trading + BB with steve M5 set file

https://myfxbook.com/members/minazri/combo/1747804


P.S. (this was before your post about the HGBnG merge )

TraderJoeForex » Thu Aug 18, 2016 5:48 pm wrote:Just received this PM and a light bulb went on (now this is no disrespect to NewGuy who posted the patched EA on Friday.. I should have tested before updating post 1 and this may not be the issue at all).

But I also realize that maybe I am complicating things too much trying to run a separate EA for buy and sell. So I have now updated post 1 with the original latest HGBnG from HGBnG thread and new set file to match. Also attached below:

So we only need 1 RnR chart, 1 HGBnG chart and 1 GridMaster chart. Simplest is usually best so hopefully this is a step back in the right direction.... let's see

Saw your remark on the Combo thread about HGBnG.
My results were pretty bad too, but I am wondering if this might the result be related to the code changes in the latest versions of HGBnG .
I only put HGBnG on my chart for the very first time this week. I used it as separate EA to learn its behavior. I first used the HGB from the Combo thread that was patched 160814 (with %27n in its name) and did not understand why it was taking short entries on a move up.
So I started a second chart with the latest from post 1. To me it this HGBnG appears to take trades differently.
I was going to use an earlier HGBnG from your thread next week to compare before making any stupid comments in the thread.
It is hard to keep up with all the different versions. I hope at least some will run the older stable version parallel to the new version for some weeks, to prove that code changes did not change behavior.
Anyway ....Might the the recent poor result be an unintended consequence due to coding changes?

Boulder » Thu Aug 18, 2016 4:11 pm wrote:
Yeah was suspecting something along these lines too. I'm going to setup an entire platform from scratch to be sure this time with the latest HGBnG.

EDIT:
Set files are attached for those interested. Here's a screen with specifically my HGBnG charts.


Both have OnlyCloseProfitablePositions = true. Let's see how things unfold.

TraderJoeForex » Thu Aug 25, 2016 1:26 pm wrote:I have been testing DottyBot and her MA this week as a replacement for HGBnG alongside RnR. It looks like it will hedge the breakouts a bit more progressively and require less account size. I like it because it does the job and is nice and simple to fine tune. Top marks to Steve and Pipcruiser for this one. Will update the set files over this weekend..

TraderJoeForex » Sun Aug 28, 2016 8:38 pm wrote:
Ok here is the DottyBot and her MA setfile I am going to use this week. Running on M5 the idea is that it will bank pips where RnR gets into drawdown. I am using H4 12LWMA for direction... and this has made me look at RnR again. From last week I feel that using M1 10LWMA cuts too many trades from RnR and takes away it's profitability. Since H4 12LWMA has been working well with DottyBot perhaps we need the longer direction with RnR too. I need a bit more forward testing this week before confirming the right mix for post 1... stay tuned.

acostafulano » Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:24 pm wrote:Hi TraderJoe!

what method are you using for trading this account?

http://www.myfxbook.com/members/ForexTr ... ve/1763758

Initial results seem ultra-impressive!

DIego