| stevehopwoodforex.com https://www.stevehopwoodforex.com/phpBB3/ Print view |
|
| Signals By Fmfx https://www.stevehopwoodforex.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=887 |
Page 12 of 29 |
| Author: | Lifesys [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Signals By Fmfx |
Hi Bernard The answer is No - you are no more against the 'trend' than any other trading method. On D1 you can see the real trend easier and use SupDem to trade breakout retracements WITH the real trend. Attached is a summary I made of WMD's "Trading with Deadly Accuracy" from - http://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?t=206723 I started programming computers with Fortran on cards in 1967, love writing code, dabble in the pursuit of the elusive auto EA and greatly respect what Steve does (I found him & MPTM looking for a trade manager). But to make money, learn SupDem is my tip. |
|
| Author: | Lifesys [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Signals By Fmfx |
Sorry first copy I posted did not have due internal credits. So here is replacement. |
|
| Author: | POH [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 6:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Signals By Fmfx |
Can confirm this trade worked out very nicely, I TP at first zone for 36 pips. Thanks. |
|
| Author: | Fmfx [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Signals By Fmfx |
Order Modified: All SL's modified to 0.8176 TP1 modified to 0.8012 Regards |
|
| Author: | bernard [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Signals By Fmfx |
Interesting!! We both come from the same ice age. I also used to code Fortran, Cobol and RPGII on IBM system 360 and System 3s!! card system, working for IBM in sixties. Thank you for the pdf. Will read it. Best Bernard |
|
| Author: | Xeroforex [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Signals By Fmfx |
Hi Fmfx, I think you mean TP1 modified to 0.8012 Just started checking your signals out this afternoon, many thanks for them. Cheers...Ted |
|
| Author: | Xeroforex [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Signals By Fmfx |
Seem to be a few of us from that industry not a coder though, I 1st worked on a LEO 326 (say what, 40 & 80 column cards, paper tape and a control consul with 3 sets of 4 binary switches) then graduated to an ICL pre George the tapes were numbered in Octal, then I got onto a real machine an IBM 360/44 (44 was a multi summation processor) then various 370's then I left the industry. And thanks for the PDF Lifesys I'll definitely give that a good read. Cheers...Ted |
|
| Author: | Fmfx [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Signals By Fmfx |
Yes correct, I meant 0.8012. My mistake Thanks |
|
| Author: | fxozgirl [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Signals By Fmfx |
POH, my bad....when I originally checked the chart I was on the daily timeframe, so assumed that I was too late for the trade. I neglected to check what time FMFX posted his signal Cheers Shelley |
|
| Author: | Larryk [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 6:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Signals By Fmfx |
Hi Fmfx, I think your signals are great, love the way that people here share when they have something good to give. Those of us who use your signals for live accounts must realise that you will not always be right, so just accept the right with the wrong and hopefully we come out on the plus side overall. Strength to you brother Larry |
|
| All times are UTC | Page 12 of 29 |
|
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited |
|