The Captains Chest - Naked Trading & Other Stuff

Post by **rewand** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:28 pm

eresz » Thu Nov 03, 2016 11:33 am wrote:one pic just for practice, full cycle, looks like it's over now.

Afterwards everything looks so simple...

gold

How about this one? NZDUSD. It is on my watchlist.

GoldenFinger · Post by **GoldenFinger** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:02 pm

anyone selling gbp pairs? might be profitable

just sold gu, gj, and bought eg

Post by **rewand** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:07 pm

GoldenFinger » Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:02 pm wrote:anyone selling gbp pairs? might be profitable just sold gu, gj, and bought eg

I am buying them (long GU, short EG), check EG daily, GU just posted not long ago. GJ I have not looked at it.

Post by **sympathy** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:12 pm

Long time guysssssssssssssss miss you alllllllllllll

GoldenFinger · Post by **GoldenFinger** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:15 pm

hi sympathy, are u a millionaire now? we miss you

Zaleske · Post by **Zaleske** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:16 pm

Hey sympathy, welcome back. I'm actually in the process of compiling your posts.

Post by **sympathy** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:23 pm

rewand » Thu Nov 03, 2016 11:50 am wrote:I am only on page 150 of this thread, have not got any info on this so far. I just wonder... to balance his books, does fox need to retrace to areas where he was not able to push price back for some reason? I noticed that for nearly every major move he makes a 50% retracement. If there is a gap, he would likely go back later and satisfy his hunger with a 50% coverage of the gap. There are times when he likely withdraws and does not take the opposite side of the transaction, hence sudden movements can take place and this kind of gaps he may not need to cover. But when price moves slower, then he may not be able to withdraw and gets stuck in the positions and offloads them later, thus he goes back and cover specifically 50% of the gap.So when in a trend toward an uncovered gap, the 50% of an uncovered gap maybe a good target too. Does it make sense? I risk 2 peanuts to test the theory on GU. Any comment? Just let me know if the idea is plain stupid..

Hey bro, i can see you are trying to figure out what is happening in this method but i will change your mindset now. This system BOSS taught us is based on reversal pattern which is accumulation, stophunts and W/M pattern ok. all you need to do is to locate a pair that has completed its level 3 and wait for that same pattern. i will show you an example on usd/chf this morning.Level 3 is all you need to understand the scope thanks.....

Post by **sympathy** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:25 pm

Zaleske » Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:16 pm wrote:Hey sympathy, welcome back. I'm actually in the process of compiling your posts.

Tanks bro.... hope you are enjoying the thread.

Post by **rewand** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:30 pm

sympathy » Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:23 pm wrote:
rewand » Thu Nov 03, 2016 11:50 am wrote:I am only on page 150 of this thread, have not got any info on this so far. I just wonder... to balance his books, does fox need to retrace to areas where he was not able to push price back for some reason? I noticed that for nearly every major move he makes a 50% retracement. If there is a gap, he would likely go back later and satisfy his hunger with a 50% coverage of the gap. There are times when he likely withdraws and does not take the opposite side of the transaction, hence sudden movements can take place and this kind of gaps he may not need to cover. But when price moves slower, then he may not be able to withdraw and gets stuck in the positions and offloads them later, thus he goes back and cover specifically 50% of the gap.So when in a trend toward an uncovered gap, the 50% of an uncovered gap maybe a good target too. Does it make sense? I risk 2 peanuts to test the theory on GU. Any comment? Just let me know if the idea is plain stupid..
Hey bro, i can see you are trying to figure out what is happening in this method but i will change your mindset now. This system BOSS taught us is based on reversal pattern which is accumulation, stophunts and W/M pattern ok. all you need to do is to locate a pair that has completed its level 3 and wait for that same pattern. i will show you an example on usd/chf this morning.Level 3 is all you need to understand the scope thanks.....

This one I understand, thanks. I have been long the USDCHF pair since morning.

OMEJEVN · Post by **OMEJEVN** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:41 pm

sympathy » Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:23 pm wrote:
rewand » Thu Nov 03, 2016 11:50 am wrote:I am only on page 150 of this thread, have not got any info on this so far. I just wonder... to balance his books, does fox need to retrace to areas where he was not able to push price back for some reason? I noticed that for nearly every major move he makes a 50% retracement. If there is a gap, he would likely go back later and satisfy his hunger with a 50% coverage of the gap. There are times when he likely withdraws and does not take the opposite side of the transaction, hence sudden movements can take place and this kind of gaps he may not need to cover. But when price moves slower, then he may not be able to withdraw and gets stuck in the positions and offloads them later, thus he goes back and cover specifically 50% of the gap.So when in a trend toward an uncovered gap, the 50% of an uncovered gap maybe a good target too. Does it make sense? I risk 2 peanuts to test the theory on GU. Any comment? Just let me know if the idea is plain stupid..
Hey bro, i can see you are trying to figure out what is happening in this method but i will change your mindset now. This system BOSS taught us is based on reversal pattern which is accumulation, stophunts and W/M pattern ok. all you need to do is to locate a pair that has completed its level 3 and wait for that same pattern. i will show you an example on usd/chf this morning.Level 3 is all you need to understand the scope thanks.....

welome back oga sympathy pls can you show me chart on usdchf showing those pattern thanks