| stevehopwoodforex.com https://www.stevehopwoodforex.com/phpBB3/ Print view |
|
| Multi 10:4 Trader EA https://www.stevehopwoodforex.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=1619 |
Page 24 of 160 |
| Author: | Wkcfx [ Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA |
Hi SlipShod, sorry for delay I'm working; First earlier i forgot to mention, trading sys NB10.4 v5.0 Stealth= false Only a couple of errors and or repetitive notes in experts journal. market info B had many div0 errors, i removed it from all charts this repeats for all pairs i have charting; 2013.03.21 14:15:56 Awesome AUDCAD,H4: removed 2013.03.21 14:15:56 Awesome AUDCAD,H4: uninit reason 1 2013.03.21 14:15:56 10.4 RSI2_on_NT_TMA AUDCAD,H4: removed 2013.03.21 14:15:56 NT TMATrue SlopeHisto MTF AUDCAD,H4: removed 2013.03.21 14:15:56 NT TMATrue SlopeHisto MTF AUDCAD,H4: uninit reason 1 2013.03.21 14:15:56 NT TMATrue SlopeHisto MTF AUDCAD,H4: deinitialized 2013.03.21 14:15:56 NT TMATrue SlopeHisto MTF AUDCAD,H4: removed 2013.03.21 14:15:56 NT TMATrue SlopeHisto MTF AUDCAD,H4: uninit reason 1 2013.03.21 14:15:56 NT TMATrue SlopeHisto MTF AUDCAD,H4: deinitialized Anyway, thanks for your great effort and help! I'm going to rung this out through tomorrow NY close and close everything out, load 1.08 when it's ready and start fresh Monday. thanks bill |
|
| Author: | MrLong [ Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA |
That is the RSI version, 1.07 doesn't use those indicators. Version 1.08 will do though, we have a choice of RSI or STOCH. Andy |
|
| Author: | snailbeard [ Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA |
The DisplayGrid() screen update uses more CPU than the trading logic. I am running two copies Empty4+EA and on a 4-core machine and I get bursts of 100% CPU usage on 2 CPUs. The simplest way of reducing the CPU load would be to reduce the rate at which the screen is updated, depending on how you use it, this could be once per 5 seconds or once per minute, etc. Also, MQL is heavy on string operations inside loops, I have some (untested) code to use index look-up instead of string comparisons: Code: Select all Brian |
|
| Author: | slipshod [ Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA |
Excellent observation. The following lines added to the top of the DisplayGrid() function might help... Code: Select all |
|
| Author: | snailbeard [ Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA |
Pending orders and margins Two similar demo accounts can produce quite different results, in my case AlpariUK throws out some orders because of the way it calculates margin. On the other hand FXDD did not kill any of the orders and the margin level is still over 600%. Therefore, the lot sizes are generally slightly higher for FXDD. The AlpariUK margins are better in terms of risk, but it means pot luck on which orders are triggered and which are killed. So ideally one should review the pending orders and rate them according to other factors by looking at the charts. I can't think of a simple way of telling an EA what my preferences are because pending orders get triggered by price action possibly before my preferred choice and if I delete the less preferred pending orders the EA might put them back in again. I could add an array filter timeDelayPair[PairIndex][datetime] or something similar to temporarily inhibit some pairs - giving other pending orders a chance to trigger instead of being killed by margin. Just thinking out loud... There does not seem to be a simple way of doing this. The Empty4 way would be to use another EA to input options for each pair and parameters and pass them via global variables. It could be called ReviewPendingOrders and have several options for each pair, like CanTrade true/false, TradeHours +hh:mm,-hh:mm, DelayPendingUntilTime: hh:mm At the moment I am using the Demo account for hints and placing some of those trades in a real account. Which no doubt is the safest way to use an EA. |
|
| Author: | NoMeK [ Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA |
I think Bob mentoned this idea on his 10.4 tread too... |
|
| Author: | fx800 [ Thu Mar 21, 2013 1:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA |
Thank you very much MrLong for a great EA v1.07 and Bob for the underlying strategy. The EA has been doing great on my live microlots account, and has increased equity by 10% from London open till 11 am London time when I closed all the trades manually. Restart again at 12 midday. Will be interesting to see the result at London close. Everything OOTB. No issues with CPU overload. No bugs to report. I would expect a great deal more interest in this thread in no time. Many congratulations again on your great effort and generosity. peter. |
|
| Author: | SWG123 [ Thu Mar 21, 2013 2:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA |
Lots of interest here, looking forward to v1.08 |
|
| Author: | acostafulano [ Thu Mar 21, 2013 2:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA |
Hi everyone, Something strange is happening in my platforms: I'm trying a "default" setup which is running nicely and profitably (Check SET 1, SCSHOT 1) http://www.myfxbook.com/members/acostaf ... ult/400603 This has some buys and sells (trades and pending trades) open, looks pretty normal. On the other hand, I have another platfrom running as per linuspoon's suggestion (using MPTM abd MPBM). So I've only changed TP/SL parameters, everything else I left untouched as you could see from the setfiles attached. (Set 2, SCSHOT 2) http://www.myfxbook.com/members/acostaf ... oon/417242 The values on the dashboard are also pretty similar, only NO SHORT TRADES WHATSOEVER ON THE SECOND PLATFORM I can't find any reasonable explanation, but I'm missing some good shorts here. HElp! |
|
| Author: | MrLong [ Thu Mar 21, 2013 3:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA |
In Steves MPTM, check these settings. extern string gen="----General inputs----"; double Lot=0.01; bool TradeLong=true; bool TradeShort=true; <=== extern int MagicNumber=0; Just a thought. Andy |
|
| All times are UTC | Page 24 of 160 |
|
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited |
|