| stevehopwoodforex.com https://www.stevehopwoodforex.com/phpBB3/ Print view |
|
| MetaNeural SuperDash https://www.stevehopwoodforex.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=1612 |
Page 4 of 6 |
| Author: | dietcoke [ Thu Mar 14, 2013 5:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MetaNeural SuperDash |
No its not. I'm looking at that function now and its a bit iffy. No slur on you dave, it's just a code dump from the original coder. Give me 30 mins and I'll post a more efficient version |
|
| Author: | effluvium [ Thu Mar 14, 2013 5:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MetaNeural SuperDash |
Thanks Dietcoke to confirm my initial impression. I have another doubt, but I'm not sure. To Test "UP Daily Bias" Daily Volume was compared: is it Higher against previous day volume? And To Test "DOWN Daily Bias" the same test is used. I Thought we should test if Daily Volume is LOWER against previous day volume ? Am I correct ? |
|
| Author: | dietcoke [ Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MetaNeural SuperDash |
No. Volume is just a a confirmation that the direction(Bias) you see is confirmed. The metaneural function is always looking for an increasing trend in volume on the daily bars. then, on the hourly timeframe, it is looking for signs that the price is moving with the daily bias after an intraday correction. |
|
| Author: | falsedave [ Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MetaNeural SuperDash |
I did look over that, In all honesty it was just a direct copy paste from the original MetaNeural Dash. I decided to leave it as it was for the time being leave the trade logic unchanged. A quick scan over to check it worked but nothing else. Then review and optimize later. |
|
| Author: | effluvium [ Thu Mar 14, 2013 8:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MetaNeural SuperDash |
OK falseDave, I'm deciding to optimize the core of the code which is intersting me, because of the reversal detection candle, which I intend to use in a future indicator I'd like to have in my charts. To begin with, here is the exact optimizing code to obtain Daily Bias (which returns 3 possible values: UP, Down, NONE). I just put the code you have given in a procedure I called GiveDailyBias Code: Select all DailyBias[index] = GiveBiasDaily(symb, 1) (1 mean the shift of the Daily Bar which is 1 because you are calculating the Previous Daily Bar) Give me a few moment and I will post the optimization code of Calculation Hourly stuff. |
|
| Author: | dietcoke [ Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MetaNeural SuperDash |
Dave, Do you know how the criteria for reversals signals came about? I'm a bit confused by the reversal failure signal // reversal failure if(MathAbs(dc[index] - do2[index]) < (dAtr * 0.02) && do2[index] > dc2[index]) Why does it not depend on increasing volume?? |
|
| Author: | effluvium [ Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MetaNeural SuperDash |
Yes, things were more simple with Daily Bias as it was just one parameter to identify. It turns really confusing when it comes to discuss Hourly Bias, and all other stuff about UphighVol, UpLowVol etc... I tried to sort out the hourly complex conditional tests by grouping them, but I'm not convinced about their logical tests. Pfffffffffffff |
|
| Author: | dietcoke [ Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MetaNeural SuperDash |
I've pm'd dave with some simplified code. Hopefully he will incorporate it later today |
|
| Author: | snailbeard [ Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MetaNeural SuperDash |
I ran a quick back test OOTB over two months (GPDUSD,H1) and all the entries were shorts even during up trends, therefore overall it was losing money. However, if long entries had occurred where the bias was up it could have been a nice little earner. I think it has plenty of potential and if I was not in the middle tweaking a variant of BBBE I would spend more time with it. I would like to revisit this one later and get a better understanding of the logic! Brian |
|
| Author: | effluvium [ Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MetaNeural SuperDash |
I'm not surprised to hear that. I'd taken a look at the rest of the code, and what conditions are sending this or this message in the EA. Needless to say that it is a complete MESS . I'm calling this code "The ROYAL Spaghetti ", and I failed even to understand the logic behind the construction of orders displayed in this EA. So I resign and admit that I'm "knoked OUT" and I'm abandoning that (I had the plan to adapt some ideas about reversal to integrate them in a small indi), but Finally it doesn't worth to lose more time on it. I wonder who is the first code author (I know he's not FalseDave). I can tell you He's the chef of the chef for Spaghetti meals. |
|
| All times are UTC | Page 4 of 6 |
|
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited |
|