Awesome + SS version

[billv]

Hi Nev :hi:

Your setup might not break for a while (if it breaks)
so I would continue using the same settings.

I don't use the daily profit function but I also don't like it because it is a % of the balance which includes -ve trades.

I have seen trade size go up and down as my equity increases/decreases and it looks about right to me
but as I don't trade the EA live, I have not looked into the accuracy of the trade size calculations.
I also don't believe that an error of plus or minus 0.01 size is significant for this type of trading .

But what I don't understand is why you want to trade a larger live account with only 1 month of live data.

Do you have Recovery=true in each timeframe or do you only rely on the "fill the gap" function for recovery?
These 2 functions will interfere with each other but because you use such a large gap value, the recovery function could help you.

Cheers
Bill

[billv]

or every $1000 in the account it should trade 0.01 but my problem is its taking trades of 0.09 and 0.1 with a balance of $8671 is this correct behaviour and its not waiting for a target of $86.71 which is 1% but the EA is banking varying amounts/day. .

Why don't you keep on using the basket closure for your 1% target?
Target is one thing but if it reaches the daily target it will stop trading for the day and why would you stop trading a multi-currency basket EA which has open trades?

[Letsarb]

Hi Nev :hi:

Do you have Recovery=true in each timeframe or do you only rely on the "fill the gap" function for recovery?
These 2 functions will interfere with each other but because you use such a large gap value, the recovery function could help you.

Cheers
Bill

Hi Bill,

Why do you not add a variable "TradesToConstituteFilltheGap" which has to be superior to "TradesToConstituteRecovery" ?
I mean, when you think that recovery is enough and could not easily recover your position, it would be time to start the "Fill the Gap" process..

Does make sense ?

Cheere

Nicolas

[billv]

Hi Bill,

Why do you not add a variable "TradesToConstituteFilltheGap" which has to be superior to "TradesToConstituteRecovery" ?
I mean, when you think that recovery is enough and could not easily recover your position, it would be time to start the "Fill the Gap" process..

Does make sense ?

Cheere

Nicolas

Hi Nicolas

I know what you mean but I don't know if it will be of benefit until we try it.
I will add it to the list.

Have a nice day
Bill

[chrisdk2018]

Results for last week Until this thing breaks im assuming it can make my dream of 1% per day which compounded gives us a significant income over time so banking small profits/day is enough in my opinion. Using this site you can experiment with varying interest rates/day and select how much to reinvest http://compoundaily.com/ As you can see over 365 days with no weekends traded and 100% reinvested we can generate $18,390.01 So with this in mind I have an issue with my EA, I am running another account with a balance of $8671 so with the setting I would expect to bank approx 1% per day and the lots traded increase by 9 or to trade 0.09 because I also have so for every $1000 in the account it should trade 0.01 but my problem is its taking trades of 0.09 and 0.1 with a balance of $8671 is this correct behaviour and its not waiting for a target of $86.71 which is 1% but the EA is banking varying ammounts/day. What settings should I be looking at to achieve the 1% per day? Thanks in advance for any help you can give and hope ive explained this properly.

The different trade sizes are calculated based on your equity so if equity goes down the lot size will go down too.

[c1borg]

Hi Nev :hi:

Your setup might not break for a while (if it breaks)
so I would continue using the same settings.

I don't use the daily profit function but I also don't like it because it is a % of the balance which includes -ve trades.

I have seen trade size go up and down as my equity increases/decreases and it looks about right to me
but as I don't trade the EA live, I have not looked into the accuracy of the trade size calculations.
I also don't believe that an error of plus or minus 0.01 size is significant for this type of trading .

But what I don't understand is why you want to trade a larger live account with only 1 month of live data.

Do you have Recovery=true in each timeframe or do you only rely on the "fill the gap" function for recovery?
These 2 functions will interfere with each other but because you use such a large gap value, the recovery function could help you.

Cheers
Bill

The large account is a demo and I rely totally on fill the gap function for recovery. I have now started using Rene's Trade Chart which has shown some worrying behaviour I will post soon on this. I still think with some minor tinkering the EA can be improved further, I am now considering posting my setfile so I can get help achieving this.

[c1borg]

Another winning day and I thought I would show the trades without any manual interventions and any fiddling. I do actually have almost 2 months of data now but the results below are completely hands off and represent approx 1 month to date. The equity/day target is now working correctly

Capture.PNG

Capture2.png

[aizabelle]

Another winning day and I thought I would show the trades without any manual interventions and any fiddling...

Niiice! This EA kinda reminds me of the CCfp indicator I saw in FF last year and been using, but I've just downloaded this now and still about to see and test myself if they have similar suggested pairs to trade, and where they differ exactly if ever (aside from time of entry and TP). Thanks for sharing

[c1borg]

I basically trade 21 pairs in V1 AUDCAD, AUDCHF, AUDNZD, AUDJPY, AUDUSD, CADCHF, CADJPY, CHFJPY, EURAUD, EURCAD, EURGBP, EURNZD, EURJPY, EURUSD, GBPJPY, GBPUSD, NZDUSD, NZDJPY, USDCAD, USDCHF, USDJPY but this may not be the best thing to do in the long run I am collecting more data every day and some so far this month are loosers, however will they be winners next month thats my worry if I exclude them.

Capture.PNG

Maybe we should add more pairs?
Daily 1% profit just locked in on my live account another question is do we carry on trading 24hrs and not stop after profit reached?

[forexsiuk]

Hi
I think there is some great work that has been done here and I would like to thank all.
My own observations after running A+SS and its predecessors are that I think there is possibly some further thought that needs to go into profit taking by basket %. I really like the princible of this however it seems to me that this runs into problems due to scaling ratios.
For example: Account size = £1000
Lot Size Per £1000 = 0.01
Basket Profit Target (either balence or equity) = 1%
All is fine and dandy until the balance/equity grows to £1800 for example, as the lot size is still 0.01
Now the profit target is 1.8% compared with the 'actual' target of 1%, which is pushing A+SS a little to far in my opinion. I realise that profit targets etc can be adjusted manually at the end of every completed cycle, but this can be overlooked.
Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
Thanks.