| stevehopwoodforex.com https://www.stevehopwoodforex.com/phpBB3/ Print view |
|
| Aussiedoc's Duck'n'Bob https://www.stevehopwoodforex.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=633 |
Page 4 of 4 |
| Author: | fxozgirl [ Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Aussiedoc's Duck'n'Bob |
|
|
| Author: | DING [ Sun Jul 22, 2012 2:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Aussiedoc's Duck'n'Bob |
I demo the bot one week but have not any order be open, I sort out the code and find this line code maybe a issue, I will modify the code to test again,FYI void GetMaCross() { double pv1 = GetMa(SlowMaTdTF, SlowMaTdPeriod, SlowMaTdShift, SlowMaTdMethod, SlowMaTdAppliedPrice, CrossCandlesBack + 1); |
|
| Author: | theforexedge [ Fri Jul 27, 2012 1:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Aussiedoc's Duck'n'Bob |
Ding Did the changes to the code work? Jason |
|
| Author: | DING [ Fri Jul 27, 2012 2:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Aussiedoc's Duck'n'Bob |
no, i need sort a again. |
|
| Author: | Aussiedoc [ Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Aussiedoc's Duck'n'Bob |
Shelley, hi! I've been out of action for a bit. Just starting to catch up. How did those trades go? Cheers |
|
| Author: | garyfritz [ Mon Jul 30, 2012 8:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Aussiedoc's Duck'n'Bob |
Mighty nicely, if she held onto them. I see the trades she took are also the strongest pairs in the NBob system this month -- not too surprising, considering how you've worked TMA into the later versions. I need to take a closer look at the Doc Ducks! |
|
| Author: | garyfritz [ Tue Jul 31, 2012 7:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Aussiedoc's Duck'n'Bob |
(??? Doc's response disappeared while I was responding to it. I'm pretty sure I didn't delete it... Just to restore the continuity, here is the content of his missing post:) OK, but no promises of miracles. Is Steve's summary in post 1 still an accurate representation of how you trade the plucked ducks? Questions... 1 & 2 -- you're using an SMMA there, correct? I frankly don't know what Empty4 thinks a smoothed MA is, but I'll dig into it if I have to. What is TD? 3-7 -- sounds like you only take the trade if TMA_slope > 0.8 and Slope_Display > 0 on the same bar when the MAs cross, yes? What is NB_10.2_TMA_Slope_Display? I don't see that anywhere. So pending understanding of what Slope_Display is, it sounds like your entry signal is just "3ma cross over 8ma when slope > 0.8." That's a perfectly reasonable entry. Slope > 0.8 says we're in a strong trend, and the MA cross says the price is moving aggressively in that direction. Then you close when Slope < 0.4, which is also reasonable. This is just a slightly different version of how everyone's trading the slope indicator, and it should work as well as the similar versions. Like other Slope-based approaches, it relies on strong sustained trends, since the Slope often takes a while to get to 0.8. See e.g. this chart: In this example you'd be OK because the MAs crossed shortly after the trend changed. You'd have missed the whole move but you wouldn't have jumped in right at the top. In fact my biggest question is how often this actually works. Most of the time the Slope doesn't get above 0.8 until long after the MAs cross. If the market drops enough so the MAs cross back down again, it pulls the Slope down. Looking at the pairs Shelley entered, I don't see an entry signal there. Am I misunderstanding something? If I was going to suggest a change, it would be to IGNORE the magic 0.8 slope value. How long it takes to reach 0.8 is heavily dependent on the strength of the previous trend, which is irrelevant to the current trend. In the chart above, it spends almost NO time > 0.8 or < -0.8 even though the market trended strongly for weeks at a time. As I suggested in another thread, I think DIRECTION is a better signal, or maybe the DISTANCE it has traveled in one direction. Take a trade when the MAs cross if the D1 Slope is trending up. That would work well in the AUDNZD example above, and in a lot more cases. Or you could look at the amount the Slope has increased since its last turn. Enter when it's raised at least 0.2 or so from its bottom. Exit when it's dropped 0.2 or so from its top. I haven't backtested it yet but I suspect that will get you a lot better entry signals than the magic Slope levels. Gary |
|
| Author: | Aussiedoc [ Sat Aug 04, 2012 6:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Aussiedoc's Duck'n'Bob |
Gary, thanks for the reply. Sorry it has taken me so long to reply. 1. Case of "Monkey see--Monkey do!" 2. Further confirmation of TD.[/quote] Gary, the "plucked version" is:- OPEN TRADE 3. at candle open is TMA_Slope >0.4/-0.4 Y/N? 4. If N - wait for next candle. 5. If Y - wait for next candle. 6. If Y - At candle open is TMA_Slope >0.5/-0.5 Y/N? 7. If Y - open trade in TD. 8. Set SL = previous pivot/3 candles back 9. Only 1 trade in TD per MA cross. CLOSE TRADE 10. Each subsequent candle - is TMA_Slope_Norm > 0.4/-0.4 Y/N 11. If Y - next candle; 12. If N - close trade. 13. Repeat sequence until Y condition. They are only there as confirmation of a change in Trend Direction. To my limited understanding it seems that the display the 10.2 Slope_Norm indicator gives corresponding to each candle superseded them - so I ditched them. Steve coded them into the EA he built so I didn't need them on the screen. Gary, completely open to suggestion here! Gary, since joining the Forum I am amazed at how little I actually know about all things Forex - and how much I have learned in the past year to reach the "so little" mark! I stand in awe at the knowledge you all possess. I also understand that, as my daughters so often tell me, "Daddy, you have spent your whole life practicing how to make it look and sound so easy!" - also applies to you! My dream/thought/expectation was, and is, to have an indication that - when then correct values align for a trade entry (the Ducks quack in unison) - I be able to easily recognize that time via either an onscreen display or sound alert (triggering of the alert.wav in the Empty4 platform sounds folder); or both -- so I can trade my way to cutting back my work-load from 120+ hours per week to a more reasonable 40 or so. As I originally said, I believe that being able to also consistently trade the shorter time-frames (H4, H1, M15) will help me to achieve that. Unfortunately, to do so requires I be able to devote the time necessary to monitor said time-frames; which so far I have been unable to do consistently. This is where I place myself completely in your hands. Your comments above have high-lighted knowledge that hitherto was in what we call Area 3 knowledge - what I didn't know I didn't know (the only area of true intellectual growth). Gary, my world is a results oriented worlds. Based upon what you have already said above - can I pleased leave the "how" to you - in the trust that whatever you accomplish will be more that adequate for the job? Thanks a million. Cheers Mark (aka Doc) |
|
| Author: | garyfritz [ Sun Aug 05, 2012 5:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Aussiedoc's Duck'n'Bob |
Doc and I have been discussing some of this offline. Before I tackle this one I want to make sure I understand where he is on the PM discussions. |
|
| All times are UTC | Page 4 of 4 |
|
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited |
|