Old and defunct Holy Graily Bob

cydie · Post by **cydie** » Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:46 pm

if this result continue until friday!! im ready to put this in my live account next week!!!!

Post by **mobthehop** » Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:59 pm

Steve,

could you please have a look at line 2475 (GetNext20 routine) - ssp1= ssp1 - ssp1%sublevels;

That doesn't look right...

Cheers

feucht · Post by **feucht** » Tue Dec 09, 2014 4:06 pm

I am getting repeated InsertTakeProfit stop loss insertion failed with error 130:invalid stops on a number of existing trades since updating to version s

Post by **johnsund** » Tue Dec 09, 2014 4:14 pm

feucht » Tue Dec 09, 2014 10:06 am wrote:I am getting repeated InsertTakeProfit stop loss insertion failed with error 130:invalid stops on a number of existing trades since updating to version s

Getting the same alerts.

Post by **matt_32** » Tue Dec 09, 2014 4:14 pm

feucht » Tue Dec 09, 2014 6:06 pm wrote:I am getting repeated InsertTakeProfit stop loss insertion failed with error 130:invalid stops on a number of existing trades since updating to version s

Your best bet is to delete all orders and start from scratch. After all this is demo trading. If , on the other hand, you wanna keep your demo running, then identify (by their id number) which particular order(s) causes the problem and delete it.

In my example below the order with No 8860076 causes problem.... so just intervene and delete it !

Matt

Post by **Elixe** » Tue Dec 09, 2014 4:18 pm

mobthehop » 14 minutes ago wrote:Steve,

could you please have a look at line 2475 (GetNext20 routine) - ssp1= ssp1 - ssp1%sublevels;

That doesn't look right...

Cheers

Hi Mobthehop,

There doesn't seem to be any problem here, we are substracting ssp1 with the results of ssp1 modulo sublevels, that would give the closest inferior rounded number at sublevels, then depending of the order type we add or substract a sublevels value

Post by **SteveHopwood** » Tue Dec 09, 2014 4:27 pm

mobthehop » Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:59 pm wrote:Steve,

could you please have a look at line 2475 (GetNext20 routine) - ssp1= ssp1 - ssp1%sublevels;

That doesn't look right...

Cheers

Nope. Don't understand it.

Nor do I care if it looks right so long as it works.

feucht · Post by **feucht** » Tue Dec 09, 2014 4:37 pm

Thanks Mat, have done so and the errors have stopped, they were easy to find as they had no SL or TP.

Post by **rdg281** » Tue Dec 09, 2014 4:47 pm

Hi Guys,

Loaded the S version now.
Yesterday night started 18 pairs. Not the chf pairs because my other account then then the Globel is counting a lot of margin for the chf pairs. And curiosity of course

With the Q version started closed all this morning at h8.00 227 pips, loaded the R version closed all at h16.30
1043 pips.

And that with the little bugs versions.
Steve and compagnions you must go for the Nobel price.
It looks true that it is better to close all 2 or 3 times a day, like Bob and Steve said.
I have OOTB
60min
No range trades
and snapshot off

I don't know how to thank you all that time of work and that for helping us.
Chapeau :hi: :hi: :hi:

Cheers,

Roberto

Post by **acostafulano** » Tue Dec 09, 2014 5:49 pm

At the risk of getting yelled at I need to ask the following (and please let me note I've read the entire thread+BOb's+manual):

Why is the EA taking trend/rad trades disregarding the MA60/MA240's position? As per Bob's strategy, we only take Trend and Rad trades when in accordance to the actual trend (as determined by the MA's, regardless of the TF we're running this in).

I get the signals from TMATrue are very good, but is there a way to have them trade only in direction of the trend as defined by bob?

(PS. I'm trading HGI as a basket trader on M15, with global closure at adaptive 8 pips per trade, no closure on opposite signal. Good results so far, but I'm sure having the trades respect the trend would yield better results)