hmmm, what EA?
Charles 2.1.5 or Charles2.1.8a
Dietmar
| stevehopwoodforex.com https://www.stevehopwoodforex.com/phpBB3/ Print view |
|
| a good ea; to try https://www.stevehopwoodforex.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=1262 |
Page 5 of 6 |
| Author: | musky [ Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a good ea; to try |
Not bad at all so far, all default running for a week. |
|
| Author: | forextrader-radioman [ Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a good ea; to try |
hmmm, what EA? Charles 2.1.5 or Charles2.1.8a Dietmar |
|
| Author: | musky [ Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a good ea; to try |
2.1.8a ten random pairs |
|
| Author: | falsedave [ Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a good ea; to try |
I remember this EA from a while ago, found it on MQL codebase then followed it onto forexmetro I think was in French I think so had to translate. I have version 1.3.6 through 2.1.3. Was great for me for a while then blew up the account , but its what got me intrested in trying to code my own EA's as I couldnt work out what it was trying to do and how I could fix it. Will have a look at this again now that I have a bit more coding experience. Could be really interesting. Dave |
|
| Author: | AGT [ Thu Jan 03, 2013 2:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a good ea; to try |
So its worth to have a look on this bot - especially on Dietmars acc's (see some posts earlier at the beginning 2012 dec !) ... may be this a good one for further testing .... although I didn't try this one bcz the experience with this bot is a bit more ambiguous ... it didn't work for someone in the past ... so I'm not really sure about this EA ... hmmm But so far the results are pretty good !!  |
|
| Author: | cuzgeorge [ Thu Jan 03, 2013 2:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a good ea; to try |
The understatement- of 2012. Sorry Dave , had to have a chuckle at your expense here.  Okay, i'm not thrilled with this bot and needs a lot of time to look into. Following post, are the results from the various demos and settings. please ponder them and let me know if you would like the set files to continue. Check the name of the pic and see when the demo started. The DD is also high here , can get rather high but have'nt spent time to play around here, so in its defense, there might be someone who can continue here. The standard 2.1.5 set went horribly wrong for me with massive DD so i had canned it some time ago. It was shgowing a profit, but would'nt go near it with that DD. regards cuz |
|
| Author: | AGT [ Thu Jan 03, 2013 3:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a good ea; to try |
Ok ... hmmm  - looking at cuz's post above: this bot is more a doubtful thingy ? It seems it will fail sooner or later ... wont touch this one I think ... or is here anybody able to provide good arguments for further extended testing ?  |
|
| Author: | cuzgeorge [ Thu Jan 03, 2013 3:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a good ea; to try |
AGT, I havent stopped them yet but so caught up in other EA's i hardly have time to follow up. I would carry on here for at least another 2 or 3 months, then check results again. Gotta always give it a good shot. regards cuz |
|
| Author: | AGT [ Thu Jan 03, 2013 4:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a good ea; to try |
ok ... best would be perhaps to follow Dietmars acc's ... they are running already a month ... so lets see what they will bring up ... dec 11 / 2012: http://www.stevehopwoodforex.com/phpBB3 ... 2&start=30  |
|
| Author: | SWG123 [ Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a good ea; to try |
OK, not the prettiest of curves but +5.2% after 5 weeks with UPL maxing at -11% so far:- |
|
| All times are UTC | Page 5 of 6 |
|
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited |
|