MurphyMan » Mon Dec 15, 2014 6:57 pm wrote:
Lee .

I was having the exact same problem - for days! My brain was completely scrambled, which according to my wife and Steve is a state of normalcy.

Of course, the name of the indicator is HGI_v15.01

In the settings I somehow had HGI_v.15.01 Just a simple little dot.

MurphyMan wrote:

Have you checked that the 'HGI_Name' in the HGB Inputs matches the HG Indicator that you have in your indicators folder?

Lee

Lee .

I was having the exact same problem - for days! My brain was completely scrambled, which according to my wife and Steve is a state of normalcy.

Of course, the name of the indicator is HGI_v15.01

In the settings I somehow had HGI_v.15.01 Just a simple little dot.

Thanks Lee. I hope this also helps someone else.

Sam

PontusLSE » Tue Dec 16, 2014 5:02 am wrote:Hey pals

I´m mostly lurking around here, but this EA ( and the indi) really caught my attention, brilliant work Steve, Bob and everybody else who is involved. Absolutely stunning.

I did get alot of "Error 130 - invalid stops", and after some look at the code I want to suggest this change,

Old code, starting at line 1913:

Code: Select all

double CheckMinimumPipsTo20(double price20, double TradePrice,  int type)
{
   //Recalculates price if there are less than MinPipsToNext20 between TradePrice price20
   
   if (MathAbs(price20 - TradePrice) < (MinPipsToNext20 / factor) )
   {
      if (type == OP_BUY)
         price20+= (20 / factor);
      else
         price20-= (20 / factor);
   }//if (MathAbs(price20 - TradePrice) < (MinPipsToNext20 / factor) )
   
   
   return(price20);

}//double CheckMinimumPipsTo20(double price, int type)

New code:

Code: Select all

double CheckMinimumPipsTo20(double price20, double TradePrice,  int type)
{
   //Recalculates price if there are less than MinPipsToNext20 between TradePrice price20
   
   if (type == OP_BUY)
      if (MathAbs(TradePrice -price20) < (MinPipsToNext20 / factor) )
      {
            price20+= (20 / factor);
      }//if (MathAbs(TradePrice -price20) < (MinPipsToNext20 / factor) )
   
   else
      if (MathAbs(price20 - TradePrice) < (MinPipsToNext20 / factor) )
      {
            price20-= (20 / factor);
      }//if (MathAbs(price20 - TradePrice) < (MinPipsToNext20 / factor) )
   
   
   return(price20);

}//double CheckMinimumPipsTo20(double price, int type)

SteveHopwood » Mon Dec 15, 2014 2:13 pm wrote:Guys, just to let you know I really appreciate what you are doing here.

I know that HGB still has some bugs. To be honest, they are annoying me but not actually impinging on what I am trying to do in demo trading. So, they are on a back burner so far as I am concerned - something to deal with in the future.

Anybody happy to post a fix to any bug in V2 that they have tested and found works, please do so if you are sure it is a fix and I will adopt it, with due appreciation in the source. Have a quick look at line 36 first, as a classic example of all our inattention to detail - I only noticed it this morning. No biggee, but a great example of something simple that can be missed. I didn't bother to post a fix, as nobody else had noticed. Look a tad more closely at your screen display, folks.

Please stop throwing isolated bits of code at me in the hope that I will have the time to take notice. I don't. There are lots of you but only one of me. And I still have a disabled wife to look after - in the week when I have the Christmas concerts to rehearse for. Great fun, but they reduce my coding time.

droland » Mon Dec 15, 2014 11:15 pm wrote:
Just so you know, sleep is much overrated so you still have another 8 hours to work with. Sheeesh. Some people are so selfish.

SteveHopwood » Mon Dec 15, 2014 4:40 pm wrote:

droland » Mon Dec 15, 2014 11:15 pm wrote:
Just so you know, sleep is much overrated so you still have another 8 hours to work with. Sheeesh. Some people are so selfish.

Well, we both know I am just a piss-artist with no care for my fellow beings. Bugger; you have me sussed.

Mind, given the length of time and deletions that last para (yup, and thish) took me to typsh under the latest affluence of incoho sh, you woudn't want me coding right now.

I am not joking, guys.

John » Mon Dec 15, 2014 11:44 pm wrote:
In that case, Steve, there is really only one logical next step as I see it....



HAVE ANOTHER!

Cheers!