themaxx » Fri Jul 01, 2016 6:53 am wrote:I was asked by PM for a testing update.

I don't like receiving PMs because if I respond to a PM only one person gets a benefit, but if I post in the thread everyone gets the benefit. So please, don't PM me, but post in the thread and I will respond.

Here are some test results using the system untouched on random pairs that looked to move a lot chosen by eyeball, with Steve's MPTM managing the trade closures:
After 50 pips move to +5, 50 pip jumping stop:
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/jarvisc ... 50/1652106

After 75 pips move to +5, 75 pip jumping stop:
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/jarvisc ... 75/1652107

After 100 pips move to +5, 100 pip jumping stop:
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/jarvisc ... 00/1652109

After 125 pips move to +5, 125 pip jumping stop:
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/jarvisc ... 25/1652111

You might say, wow 50% draw down, I'd never trade that - but bear in mind that floating equity never dropped below 2%, so while there was 50% in realised losses, there was 75% in floating profits, protected by the jumping stop.

windorz » Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:39 am wrote:Hi themaxx :hi:
Interesting Results

Running EA is attached post 2 or updated version by you ?

Thanks

themaxx » Fri Jul 01, 2016 5:46 pm wrote: The demo results relate to the EA attached to post 2.

I've been considering amending the EA so that it only opens one trade long/short - but while doing that lowers drawdown it also lowers profit.

themaxx » Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:46 am wrote:

windorz » Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:39 am wrote:Hi themaxx :hi:
Interesting Results

Running EA is attached post 2 or updated version by you ?

Thanks

The demo results relate to the EA attached to post 2.

I've been considering amending the EA so that it only opens one trade long/short - but while doing that lowers drawdown it also lowers profit.

porseguro » Sun Jul 03, 2016 6:16 am wrote:
Hi Maxx, any chance you can post your set file for MPTM, just to make sure I don't screw it up.
Thanks to you and Steve for the effort you are putting into this project.

themaxx » Sun Jul 03, 2016 1:42 pm wrote:

porseguro » Sun Jul 03, 2016 6:16 am wrote:
Hi Maxx, any chance you can post your set file for MPTM, just to make sure I don't screw it up.
Thanks to you and Steve for the effort you are putting into this project.

No.

My post is clear and the requirements are uncomplicated.

Stop being lazy and work it out.

porseguro » Mon Jul 04, 2016 6:49 pm wrote: So that's the thanks one gets for helping to pay for your EA.
Have a good day my friend.

themaxx » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:20 pm wrote:

porseguro » Mon Jul 04, 2016 6:49 pm wrote: So that's the thanks one gets for helping to pay for your EA.
Have a good day my friend.

Sorry, I've just been getting a lot of PMs where people just ask, ask, ask, and give nothing back.

My message was rude and I apologise for it.

MPTM and SET file are attached.

PS thank you for your contribution to the EA, but I still paid Steve $100. He deserves a lot of thanks for his coding/running the forum.