| stevehopwoodforex.com https://www.stevehopwoodforex.com/phpBB3/ Print view |
|
| ShelleyJem. Fantastic collision of accident and analysis https://www.stevehopwoodforex.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=610 |
Page 7 of 20 |
| Author: | Jemook [ Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ShelleyJem. Fantastic collision of accident and analysis |
Steve - just to confirm, when I choose the Multi TF TMA it can (for example, short) be at the top of H1 tma OR H4. It doesn't require them to BOTH be at the top, correct? |
|
| Author: | phil_trade [ Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ShelleyJem. Fantastic collision of accident and analysis |
Oh oh I just download 2.1 with this Code: Select all |
|
| Author: | SteveHopwood [ Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ShelleyJem. Fantastic collision of accident and analysis |
SJ isn't quite coded correctly for the mtf TMA's. At the mo, it confirms a buy when the market gets to the lower line of either tf, not the lower of the H1 or Upper H4. I have to go out for a bit now, but will fix this in a couple of yours. I typed that last paragraph and then realised that I still could not make any sense of what you are saying. Then I realised you are actually describing two retrace scenarios. For the buy trade:
|
|
| Author: | phil_trade [ Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ShelleyJem. Fantastic collision of accident and analysis |
OK. So what I read in code, Steve, is that you dont' check MA crossing AFTER TMA Hit and you use the same function TmaTrueFilter so you akways check TMA H1 or H4 > Upper or TMA H1 or H4 < Lower |
|
| Author: | SteveHopwood [ Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ShelleyJem. Fantastic collision of accident and analysis |
It didn't, but it does now. Either H1 OR H4 will do the job. V 1c; post 1. |
|
| Author: | Jemook [ Thu Jun 07, 2012 5:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ShelleyJem. Fantastic collision of accident and analysis |
Ok so I just launched my first test batch for fun, woohoo! However, it says AUDUSD is TMA = buy but price is at the top TMA on H1 and H4 and it should be at the bottom TMA band. Looks like a whoopsie Steve? What do you reckon. |
|
| Author: | phil_trade [ Thu Jun 07, 2012 5:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ShelleyJem. Fantastic collision of accident and analysis |
All is correct at home : same trade possible with V1,V1b and V1c only sell GBPJPY and sell GBPUSD do you confirm Steve analyse Jemook : For the buy trade: - Scenario 1): market hits the bottom H1 TMA, so it has retraced and we can wait for it to reach the 5.1 on its way back up. - Scenario 2: market has reached the upper H4 TMA band and so has risen a long way. It needs to fall back below the 5.1 before it can be considered to have retraced sufficiently to be tradable. |
|
| Author: | Jemook [ Thu Jun 07, 2012 5:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ShelleyJem. Fantastic collision of accident and analysis |
Yes Scenario 1 is for a BUY price needs to be at the BOTTOM H1 or H4 TMA. Scenario 2 is for a SELL price needs to be at the TOP H1 or H4 TMA. |
|
| Author: | phil_trade [ Thu Jun 07, 2012 5:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ShelleyJem. Fantastic collision of accident and analysis |
oupps.. Steve talk about 2 BUY scenarios ! |
|
| Author: | Jemook [ Thu Jun 07, 2012 5:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ShelleyJem. Fantastic collision of accident and analysis |
Read this - H1 and/or H4: looks for a touch/break of the lower Tma True (not to be confused with the 10.2 Tma Slope) lower line for a buy trade, upper line for a sell - at any time within about the last 8 hours. This confirms a retrace has taken place and we are not trading on the wrong side of it. |
|
| All times are UTC | Page 7 of 20 |
|
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited |
|