Emm....yes.... 3 posts up Ferox mentions:Were they different versions of Awesome? Ferox has additional lines?
BTW When comparing headline numbers realize that you need to do some number crunching to get an apple to apple comparison:Sure. Here is the 1M4H setfile that has been running on Awesome 1c. I will start a new instance with the latest Awesome version. Lets see if it works as well.
- start date was a months earlier. When set to the same 2nd Sept start-date the gain is about 28%
- slight difference in selected crosses
- account was only $1000 ... so divide headline gain by 10 to compare to the others
- no commissions were taken into account for the 10 lots traded since 2nd Sept
I think the corrections above result in an about 2% gain for the Forex set (as straight comparison to the others).
For me the worrying number for the 1M4H set is the low 4 pip per trade expectancy. A little bit of slippage and trading costs will make you lose your wins.
The expectancy per trade of
- 15 pips for H4PeakHiLo
- 12 pips for MTF(M15+H1+H4)TP25
look much better to me.
The numbers for H1SymbolBasker5 also require some added thinking IMO. Irritatingly MyFxBook still uses the Balance instead of Equity for all calculations. With the big negative open position in the H1SB5 you almost have to halve all numbers (like Gain, ProfitFactor and expectancy) reported by MyFxBook.
Still nice numbers but IMO not as good as the 2 above.
Edit: see addition in next post about H4PeakHiLo running suddenly at .1 lots instead of 0.01