Dewey McG » Fri Dec 26, 2014 2:47 pm wrote:Just thought would share some observations after playing with this stuff. I have been using a trade simulator to see how this would work in real time. It is easy to get overly excited when opening a new chart and seeing so many perfect signals in the past, but it doesn’t work quite like that in real time. It is still pretty awesome so for the fun of it I thought I would throw up an example of how a nice trade would have appeared in real time versus what we would see in a redrawn chart.

Dewey McG » Fri Dec 26, 2014 2:47 pm wrote:Just thought would share some observations after playing with this stuff. I have been using a trade simulator to see how this would work in real time. It is easy to get overly excited when opening a new chart and seeing so many perfect signals in the past, but it doesn’t work quite like that in real time. It is still pretty awesome so for the fun of it I thought I would throw up an example of how a nice trade would have appeared in real time versus what we would see in a redrawn chart.

I would like to make a recommendation. Not to use Hurst, but rather to use the ATR channels. Reason.. ATR expand with volatility of the price action. Hurst do not. I tried Hurst a long time ago. ATR wins hands down. 12 years experience tells me not to use Hurst. Please consider the ATR channels that are set to Fibonacci values. Please trust me. Hurst are not the answer.

Now, not entirely sure why Bill sent this to me as Hurst is merely another Crap Custom Abortion in my mind and I could not care less about this and would not even bother to have nightmares about using it. Fact is, he did. I suggest you guys take some notice of one of the most experienced traders here. Up to you of course, but only and idiot fails..........etc

nanningbob » Fri Dec 26, 2014 8:07 pm wrote:Hurst is just another TMA derivative. The TMA formula is in the HGI so it would be like using MA with MACD. You will get similar results. I mean I started using V.7.0 on a live account with all the so called issues and problems for 2 weeks before we even got to this point of V. 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 and then V. 15.01, 15.02, 15.03, 15.04, 15.05, 15.06, 15.07, now 15.08 and so on and on. In fact I was doing OK with the 240/60 before we even got to Elixe adding the TMA filters.

I have learned two great truths in life:

IF YOU LOOK FOR PROBLEMS, YOU ARE GOING TO FIND THEM.
DONT LISTEN TO PEOPLE WHO LOOK FOR PROBLEMS.

I use HGI with the xxx.020 lines and trade the signals and make money. Why complicate a such a simple basic system?? It works, the majority off trades are profitable, what more could you ask for?

• Stochastic.
• RSI.
• ATR.
• Williams%.
• Bollinger Bands.
• Envelopes.
• Ichi.
• AllAverages.
• The last 15 custom indis I spent $300 each on.

Dewey McG » Fri Dec 26, 2014 8:47 pm wrote:Just thought would share some observations after playing with this stuff. I have been using a trade simulator to see how this would work in real time. It is easy to get overly excited when opening a new chart and seeing so many perfect signals in the past, but it doesn’t work quite like that in real time. It is still pretty awesome so for the fun of it I thought I would throw up an example of how a nice trade would have appeared in real time versus what we would see in a redrawn chart.