Thomas,tomele » Thu Nov 08, 2018 12:08 pm wrote:Hi Bruster.
We already have this possibility in Desky as well as in TDesk's simulation module. We have fixed pips, price fractions and atr percent as alternative SL/TP calculation methods. We obviously agree that fixed pips is the weakest method.Bruster400 » 08 Nov 2018, 10:27 wrote:So when looking for SL's and TP's we should be looking for measures with similar probability of happening. Price moves don't always give us this. (and pip moves definitely don't!)
...
If you're trading multiple currencies and you want to take the same "risk" on each, my belief is that you need to risk the same amount of cash on each "event" (SL or TP) that has the same probability of happening. I feel that sized positions and ATR based SL's and TP's are the only way to do this.
I totally agree to what you write. Nevertheless, after 3 weeks of daily simulations on my side, price fractions have performed slightly better than atr percent in my scenario. The position sizing aspect might be the missing part that would change everything.
Thanks for being the first one giving feedback.![]()
Cheers
Thomas
Really interesting to hear about your results and thanks for taking my comments as they were meant - just my opinion/feedback. I agree with you that position sizing matters although you need a large account to trade lots of symbols with meaningful position sizing. I know Desky supports position sizing via "RiskPercent" it would be interesting to use the TDesk simulation to test its performance... no pressure for this though, just another thing to add to your very long wish list. I know you've got your hands full at the moment!
It can't be said enough, amazing work.
Bruster