Prediction of turning points based on ZZ on fractal calc....

123Reverse · Post by **123Reverse** » Mon Apr 28, 2014 7:12 am

dudest » Sun Apr 27, 2014 5:09 pm wrote:By the way, EURUSDD's Ultimate Truth was about predicting the colour of the next bar, right?

There might be an 'Occam's Razor' way around this..

Bob noted in 10.7 that weekly candles usually have full bodies.

Which means that early in the week, the weekly direction is already determined (from observation, by Tuesday). ~~

What am I missing?

audjpydaily.png

jkulbeth1 · Post by **jkulbeth1** » Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:12 pm

hi cashout...I read a post on his forum (GG) where someone asked him about there very same thing....maybe it was you...and i didnt really "get" his answer, but didnt think much of it...you could be right however...Ive been around the factory for 7 or 8 years now so ive seen alot of hustlers over there ...and im almost automatically skeptical of something thats too good! but there was something different about that whole project...i mean if it isnt what he says it is, then damn he's good!! My hats off to him, cause he had me going...but there was another guy there who goes by "thoughts" who was coming really close ...and crodzilla had a few nice charts too...yes it seems a bit odd that no one can get the same results but i just figured there was a step he discovered that he was leaving out ( which is his right to do so)...cant hold that against him...but you do have a point....J

crashout · Post by **crashout** » Fri May 02, 2014 6:20 am

Hello jkulbeth1,

Even if they get the "ultimate algo", i really doubt GG or someone else share something with our poor minds who can't programming this thing ....

Post by **gg53** » Fri May 02, 2014 2:54 pm

There is nothing "Hidden" in my algo. Everything is explained, over and over, again and again, in posts and in my responses to gazillions of PM's in that FF forum. Some participants even contributed written doc's.

Since I'm so "in it" there might be some things that are left out, not because I'm hiding something, but because they are so trivial and obvious to me. I'm trying to catch up with those "little" things as time permit and explain them also.

There is one thing about this "Fractal" based system that almost everyone, amazingly, fail to see.
It has nothing to do with math, statistics or algorithm. It's in plain sight on the chart - and if you can't see it - look closer and harder... because this one I'm not going to explain.

Take a good look at the standard fractals: not where your eyes leads you - but where "trader" entry/exit points will/should be and connect the dots.

BTW: I'm not the only one who can do it - there are others, "silent" ones, who PM'ed me with their same results, begging me to shut-up. They think that a good system should be kept a secret, otherwise it will eventualy fail. I don't share that thought, the market is too big, but maybe I'm wrong.

G.

Post by **Kruspe** » Fri May 02, 2014 3:23 pm

this one I'm not going to explain

Hi GG,

nice to see you here. Please tell me how this one little thing affects this system? It should be somehow implemented in algorithm or what? I´m curious because there are so many ff members who are able to programm almost everything, but they failed with this one. And there is so many pdfs, guides etc. This is the last catch what they are missing?

Thx :hi:

jkulbeth1 · Post by **jkulbeth1** » Fri May 02, 2014 8:07 pm

...GG...you sound upset brother ! was there something in my post that you found disrespectful?...qoute ".yes it seems a bit odd that no one can get the same results but i just figured there was a step he discovered that he was leaving out ( which is his right to do so)...cant hold that against him...but you do have a point....J"...if you found offense somewhere in there , it wasnt meant to be..I actually feel like youve gone way past the point of giving out info than i would of...to me if someone wants something you gotta really work for it or at least show me that....youve given quite a bit!!! I feel like if you did it, then so can someone else if they want it bad enough!!! i understand the frustration of people asking you over and over again the same questions , that youve answered 100 times...you start to think there not even reading the thread ...but no one here meant any disrespect...If i read your post wrong then apologies and please disregard... Hope this resolves things ...best regards, J...
BTW...while im at it, let me tell you all your hard work and patients is appreciated by alot of people!

phil_trade · Post by **phil_trade** » Sat May 03, 2014 7:50 am

gg53 » Yesterday, 16:54 wrote:
there are others, "silent" ones, who PM'ed me with their same results, begging me to shut-up. They think that a good system should be kept a secret, otherwise it will eventualy fail. I don't share that thought, the market is too big, but maybe I'm wrong.

G.

" foreign exchange markets averaged $5.3 trillion per day in April 2013" It's impossible for some poor traders as us to intervene

so you can share without any doubt

Post by **Kruspe** » Sat May 03, 2014 10:58 am

They think that a good system should be kept a secret

phil_trade, you are absolutely right, but all these secrets and mysteries behind that are cool

Post by **gg53** » Sat May 03, 2014 10:27 pm

Kruspe » Fri May 02, 2014 3:23 pm wrote:
this one I'm not going to explain
Hi GG,

nice to see you here. Please tell me how this one little thing affects this system? It should be somehow implemented in algorithm or what? I´m curious because there are so many ff members who are able to programm almost everything, but they failed with this one. And there is so many pdfs, guides etc. This is the last catch what they are missing?

Thx :hi:

The whole idea is around fractals. You just need to look at them a bit differently than you are used to.
Doc's & PDF's are other members contribution of their understanding from what I already posted.

...And if you read my post - there are others that sent me very accurate results, very very very similiar to mine.

G.

Post by **scheinwerfer** » Sat May 03, 2014 11:34 pm

gg53 » Sat May 03, 2014 11:27 pm wrote:You just need to look at them a bit differently than you are used to.

If I look at it if there were 2 limps on the left and 2 limps on the right BUT a hard-on in the middle, does it start to look the part

: