Old and defunct Holy Graily Bob

[jiraiye]

I believe that Line 3292 of the latest version 2r should read as the following:

Code: Select all

      ssp= ssp1-(1*sublevels); //Next 20 down 

currently it is coded as follow:

Code: Select all

      ssp= ssp1-(0*sublevels); //Next 20 down

Saw this when my trend trades were consistently given a erroneous stop loss.

[SteveHopwood]

I believe that Line 3292 of the latest version 2r should read as the following:

Code: Select all

      ssp= ssp1-(1*sublevels); //Next 20 down 

currently it is coded as follow:

Code: Select all

      ssp= ssp1-(0*sublevels); //Next 20 down

Saw this when my trend trades were consistently given a erroneous stop loss.

You would think so, wouldn't you, as 0*sublevels = 0.

As I recall, ssp= ssp1-(1*sublevels) did not give the correct values for the next 20 down, but it is a while ago and my memory may be confusing this with something else.

Have you edited the code your way and found it works?

[jiraiye]

Hi Steve,

After the change, the first trend trade is taking the correct SL. The code does not affect the multitradependingorder() as the function does not call the GetNext20() function. Hope the above substantiates my guess

[rivelrivella]

The result of :

ssp= ssp1-(1*sublevels)

should be normally the same than

ssp= ssp1- sublevels

(1 is neutral element of multiplication)

[nonlinear]

add this feature and the robot will never fail

If it were only so simple. Prove with manual trades over a month and people will listen.

[steadtler]

add this feature and the robot will never fail

If it were only so simple. Prove with manual trades over a month and people will listen.

they already have..

[trendinator]

line 1869, should read the same as the comment on line 1873 right?

Code: Select all

//Trend Multi trades
      if (comment == TrendMultiTradeComment)
         if (!CloseEnough([b]WaveTakeProfit[/b], 0) )
         {
            take = price + (TrendMultiTakeProfit / factor);
            HiddenTakeProfit = take;
         }//if (!CloseEnough(TrendMultiTakeProfit, 0) )

[sponn]

add this feature and the robot will never fail

If it were only so simple. Prove with manual trades over a month and people will listen.

There is no way to make ea trading better than human. But with HGB Steve is very close to this

Manual trades - I believe that there is many traders who made more pips in last month that in last few years before HGI (except Nanningbob and maybe few others successfull manual traders even before HGI).

[LivinLarge]

add this feature and the robot will never fail

If it were only so simple. Prove with manual trades over a month and people will listen.

There is no way to make ea trading better than human. But with HGB Steve is very close to this

Manual trades - I believe that there is many traders who made more pips in last month that in last few years before HGI (except Nanningbob and maybe few others successfull manual traders even before HGI).

so true. all of his systems are amazing. and nothing will replace a human you need just a little bit of rationality

[SteveHopwood]

line 1869, should read the same as the comment on line 1873 right?

Code: Select all

//Trend Multi trades
      if (comment == TrendMultiTradeComment)
         if (!CloseEnough([b]WaveTakeProfit[/b], 0) )
         {
            take = price + (TrendMultiTakeProfit / factor);
            HiddenTakeProfit = take;
         }//if (!CloseEnough(TrendMultiTakeProfit, 0) )

Nice spot. Thanks.

Fix in 2s in post 1. To make the change yourself, go to line 1869.
Change
if (!CloseEnough(WaveTakeProfit, 0) )
to
if (!CloseEnough(TrendMultiTakeProfit, 0) )