Boinvests Holy Grail Playground

bazze · Post by **bazze** » Mon Jan 26, 2015 5:15 pm

:

forextraderaz · Post by **forextraderaz** » Mon Jan 26, 2015 7:49 pm

bazze » Mon Jan 26, 2015 10:15 am wrote:: : :

I had the same issue when I ran the EA...started out running fine until I got a million object does not exist alerts going off and had to stop using the EA.

FXe3 · Post by **FXe3** » Mon Jan 26, 2015 8:01 pm

I'm using 2S library version and have under general settings, maxoveralltrades=1, but the number of trades defined be each trading style is over riding the maxoveralltrades and placing numerous multi level trades as defined by the parameter

Post by **WhoKnows** » Tue Jan 27, 2015 12:22 am

I am still working on my fear that it makes a difference how you load or treat your same HGB on a chart. The reason behind this is that I found that HGB will get confused if you change your Trading Time settings after putting HGB on the chart the first time.

Before attributing missed trades to different versions of HGB you may want to test multiple instances of EXACTLY the same HGB settings with the same version.

I tested the following on a 15min EURJPY chart with HGB2r ... I gave them different magic numbers.
1. Take HGB to new chart, change the set to TF 15 min ... and leave it
2. Do the same as 1, leave it run for 1 minute, then pull up the set with H7, change TF to H4, let it run for 1 minute, pull set up with F7 and reset TF to M15.... and leave it
3. Do the same as 1, change the chart time frame to H4 (HGB stops, so with F7 start it up again), then change chart time frame again now back to 15 min, restart HGB via F7.... and leave it
4. Pull a OOTB (with 240 min setting) HGB on a 15 min chart and let it run, after 1 min use F7 to change the HGB TF to 15min and leave.

Basically you now have 4 HGB's running on 15 min chart with exactly the same settings (only difference is magic number) on the same computer. The other difference is that you used F7 to change something.

Result after 8 hours:
- 1 and 4 basically the same trades at the same time (time stamps only milliseconds different)
- 2 missed two signals compared to 1 and 4 (2 times wave and 5 multi's less)
- 3 had the same signals as 1 and 4 , but took the trades about 3 minutes later

I don't see any pattern yet so I will repeat the test.
But next time I will include 4 HGB's where I do only step 1 to see if I can find differences at the most basic once set install and run scenario.

You may want to do some basic testing yourself with keeping the HGB version the same.
Missed trades might just be a instability Empty4 thing. Apparently Empty4 is quite finicky.

AGT · Post by **AGT** » Tue Jan 27, 2015 12:38 am

WhoKnows » Tue Jan 27, 2015 1:22 am wrote:........... Apparently Empty4 is quite finicky ... or simply crappy .

earlb38 · Post by **earlb38** » Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:26 am

Can someone help please with the trade managment on the Mod1 version for Wave trades only
for some reason i cant get the JS 100 to work
My settings are

SL 100
BE 100+10
JS 100

The BE 100+10 works fine when trade reaches 100 pips profit but when next profit level arrives the JS 100 does not move the SL

I get the error box come up in screenshot which seems to suggest i have something missing

does anyone have a set file i could have so i can check what i may have wrong please

qvintus · Post by **qvintus** » Tue Jan 27, 2015 12:53 pm

Anyone else noticed that it is the CHF pairs that is giving most green pips so far this week

earlb38 · Post by **earlb38** » Tue Jan 27, 2015 3:25 pm

After thinking about this is it possible that there is nothing wrong with my JS 100 that it is working that is why i get the error message it is trying to move the SL but maybe something with the EA wont let it instead

I dont know just asking the question am i looking in wrong place

Post by **acostafulano** » Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:35 pm

This is quite interesting.. are you using every tick in all instances? Nothing else varying regarding the setfile?
Please do keep us posted

WhoKnows » Mon Jan 26, 2015 7:22 pm wrote:I am still working on my fear that it makes a difference how you load or treat your same HGB on a chart. The reason behind this is that I found that HGB will get confused if you change your Trading Time settings after putting HGB on the chart the first time.

Before attributing missed trades to different versions of HGB you may want to test multiple instances of EXACTLY the same HGB settings with the same version.

I tested the following on a 15min EURJPY chart with HGB2r ... I gave them different magic numbers.
1. Take HGB to new chart, change the set to TF 15 min ... and leave it
2. Do the same as 1, leave it run for 1 minute, then pull up the set with H7, change TF to H4, let it run for 1 minute, pull set up with F7 and reset TF to M15.... and leave it
3. Do the same as 1, change the chart time frame to H4 (HGB stops, so with F7 start it up again), then change chart time frame again now back to 15 min, restart HGB via F7.... and leave it
4. Pull a OOTB (with 240 min setting) HGB on a 15 min chart and let it run, after 1 min use F7 to change the HGB TF to 15min and leave.

Basically you now have 4 HGB's running on 15 min chart with exactly the same settings (only difference is magic number) on the same computer. The other difference is that you used F7 to change something.

Result after 8 hours:
- 1 and 4 basically the same trades at the same time (time stamps only milliseconds different)
- 2 missed two signals compared to 1 and 4 (2 times wave and 5 multi's less)
- 3 had the same signals as 1 and 4 , but took the trades about 3 minutes later

I don't see any pattern yet so I will repeat the test.
But next time I will include 4 HGB's where I do only step 1 to see if I can find differences at the most basic once set install and run scenario.

You may want to do some basic testing yourself with keeping the HGB version the same.
Missed trades might just be a instability Empty4 thing. Apparently Empty4 is quite finicky.

Post by **WhoKnows** » Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:37 pm

acostafulano » Wed Jan 28, 2015 5:35 am wrote:This is quite interesting.. are you using every tick in all instances? Nothing else varying regarding the setfile?
Please do keep us posted

Yep, as mentioned everything same and every tick used.