The Hidden Pending EA

[putusernamehere]

Hi tommaso :hi:

in TheHiddenPending EA is a bug i cant change the windowcolor in the infobox and if I delete the EA from the chart the colored infobox is not delete


Cheers Gunter :hi:

[milanese]

Hi tommaso :hi:

in TheHiddenPending EA is a bug i cant change the windowcolor in the infobox and if I delete the EA from the chart the colored infobox is not delete


Cheers Gunter :hi:

Thanks for spotting this Gunter
As always you find the update to TheHiddenPendingEA_149 attached on the first post

Cheers

Tommaso

[milanese]

Hi tommaso :hi:

in TheHiddenPending EA is a bug i cant change the windowcolor in the infobox and if I delete the EA from the chart the colored infobox is not delete


Cheers Gunter :hi:

Thanks for spotting this Gunter
As always you find the update to TheHiddenPendingEA_149 attached on the first post

Cheers

Tommaso

sorry I uploaded a debug version Please Redownload HiddenPendingEA_150

[putusernamehere]

Hi Tommaso :hi:

you are Great

it works perfect

Cheers Gunter :hi:

[Over60]

Hi Milanese,

Thanks at first for all the new improvements and design.

The idea to move the pendings from ”Gunter” works, but it works too, when orders were already triggered by stacking.

See attached pic, where the pending-order-line (buy-green line) moves below the already triggered buys.
That should not be, considering already stacked orders.

With simple words, if there are e.g. already buy-orders, the moving buy pending should not operate and should remain above the latest triggered buy.

Stay tuned …

With kind regards
Over60

[milanese]

Hi Milanese,

Thanks at first for all the new improvements and design.

The idea to move the pendings from ”Gunter” works, but it works too, when orders were already triggered by stacking.

See attached pic, where the pending-order-line (buy-green line) moves below the already triggered buys.
That should not be, considering already stacked orders.

With simple words, if there are e.g. already buy-orders, the moving buy pending should not operate and should remain above the latest triggered buy.

Stay tuned …

With kind regards
Over60

The HPEA will for this operation only recognize trades with his own magicnumber. The "trailing" will only happen if the HPEA not recognizes any open trade with it's own magicnumber, but if there are other trades in same symbol open and no trades with it's own magicnumber, the HPEA will trail the first pendingsorder if you set this option to true.

Cheers

Tommaso

[jauhar]

Hi Tommaso,

I started using HP together with APTM since Monday, and so far the results are excellent. The flexibility and the ATR based calculations in both EAs make them suitable for any strategy. Thanks a lot.

I have a question in HP. I enabled both buy and sell stop orders with no stacking and DeleteOppositeAfterFill=true. Now when an order is filled, the opposite pending is removed without problem. But when there is an error (off qoutes) in opening an order, the order is removed and its opposite is still active. I mean when a buy fails to fill with some error, the green line disappears but the red is still there. Is this behavior by design?

Cheers,
Jauhar

[milanese]

Hi Tommaso,

I started using HP together with APTM since Monday, and so far the results are excellent. The flexibility and the ATR based calculations in both EAs make them suitable for any strategy. Thanks a lot.

I have a question in HP. I enabled both buy and sell stop orders with no stacking and DeleteOppositeAfterFill=true. Now when an order is filled, the opposite pending is removed without problem. But when there is an error (off qoutes) in opening an order, the order is removed and its opposite is still active. I mean when a buy fails to fill with some error, the green line disappears but the red is still there. Is this behavior by design?

Cheers,
Jauhar

Thanks for your, post. Which broker are you using? I had never this problem with GlobalPrime. That is why the HPEA uses in that part still an older code solution from me.
You are right in the actual structure the EA deletes the pending in case it was not filled by error, this is a security feature, you are too right, that in this case the opposite order will remain as the EA is unable to know what would be for you the more important order. But I can recode if this part if you would like the EA not to delete the pending order in that cases. But to give a chance for a retry..

Cheers

Tommaso

[jauhar]

Hi Tommaso,

I started using HP together with APTM since Monday, and so far the results are excellent. The flexibility and the ATR based calculations in both EAs make them suitable for any strategy. Thanks a lot.

I have a question in HP. I enabled both buy and sell stop orders with no stacking and DeleteOppositeAfterFill=true. Now when an order is filled, the opposite pending is removed without problem. But when there is an error (off qoutes) in opening an order, the order is removed and its opposite is still active. I mean when a buy fails to fill with some error, the green line disappears but the red is still there. Is this behavior by design?

Cheers,
Jauhar

Thanks for your, post. Which broker are you using? I had never this problem with GlobalPrime. That is why the HPEA uses in that part still an older code solution from me.
You are right in the actual structure the EA deletes the pending in case it was not filled by error, this is a security feature, you are too right, that in this case the opposite order will remain as the EA is unable to know what would be for you the more important order. But I can recode if this part if you would like the EA not to delete the pending order in that cases. But to give a chance for a retry..

Cheers

Tommaso

Hi Tommaso,

Thanks for the reply. My broker is FXCM. Since Monday, 9 orders were filled without problem but 3 got the off quotes error and then I removed the HP manually as the opposite pending was active. I think it would be nice if the EA retry opening the order if it fails in the first try. By the way, my settings were: slippage=1, MaxSpreadAllowedMultiplicator=1, and MaxDiffPrice=4. Maybe I need to increase the slippage to 2 to avoid the error.

cheers,
Jauhar

[milanese]

Hi Tommaso,

Thanks for the reply. My broker is FXCM. Since Monday, 9 orders were filled without problem but 3 got the off quotes error and then I removed the HP manually as the opposite pending was active. I think it would be nice if the EA retry opening the order if it fails in the first try. By the way, my settings were: slippage=1, MaxSpreadAllowedMultiplicator=1, and MaxDiffPrice=4. Maybe I need to increase the slippage to 2 to avoid the error.

cheers,
Jauhar

I will later post an update for this, try with FXCM slippage=5, as they unfortunately do sometimes requote....

Cheers

Tommaso