Why dont you help yourself and start reading in this forum? All your questions will be answered then.FxFx » 30 Jun 2016, 22:56 wrote:Maybe Steve could help ? ?
Cheers, Thomas
Why dont you help yourself and start reading in this forum? All your questions will be answered then.FxFx » 30 Jun 2016, 22:56 wrote:Maybe Steve could help ? ?
Okay - Back to topicTraderJoeForex » Thu Jun 30, 2016 8:14 pm wrote:
top results.. perhaps worth playing with the grid size to suit each pair too?
5400 clean pips just on GJ so far this week from two versions combined ..
magic 1000 with CSS D1
magic 2000 with CSS M5
The CSS tests started on demo this week for me. On Live I had the M5 set no CSS set I posted and then updated with M5 CSS enabled as the benefit became clear. Now I am feeling two charts one with M5 CSS and one with D1 CSS may be an interesting way forwards for trading one pair. The overall position could at any time either be partially hedged or doubled up depending on the CSS correlations.fxstrategie » Fri Jul 01, 2016 7:38 am wrote:
Okay - Back to topic![]()
Oh - your back to enabling CSS? Why you change your mind? But looks very impressive! Great Testing Work! Du you use the same Settings as in your Setfile before, but with css enabled?
Maybe i'll try this too... Actually i dont play with the grid Sizes - it was just a first test - proof of concept - if most of the pairs also working on a Cent Account... terrible spreads and just Market Orders and non ECN![]()
I go with your Idea to use different Spreads per Pair... but what would be useful? Use an ATR Divider on the last 20 Days as in the other ones?
TJF,TraderJoeForex » Sat Jul 02, 2016 12:28 am wrote:The CSS tests started on demo this week for me. On Live I had the M5 set no CSS set I posted and then updated with M5 CSS enabled as the benefit became clear. Now I am feeling two charts one with M5 CSS and one with D1 CSS may be an interesting way forwards for trading one pair. The overall position could at any time either be partially hedged or doubled up depending on the CSS correlations.fxstrategie » Fri Jul 01, 2016 7:38 am wrote:
Okay - Back to topic![]()
Oh - your back to enabling CSS? Why you change your mind? But looks very impressive! Great Testing Work! Du you use the same Settings as in your Setfile before, but with css enabled?
Maybe i'll try this too... Actually i dont play with the grid Sizes - it was just a first test - proof of concept - if most of the pairs also working on a Cent Account... terrible spreads and just Market Orders and non ECN![]()
I go with your Idea to use different Spreads per Pair... but what would be useful? Use an ATR Divider on the last 20 Days as in the other ones?
Additionally I am now testing HGBnG separated into buy only and sell only EA's. Since the EA trades one direction from the first trade until the whole grid is cleared (when close on wavy or opposite ONLY IN PROFIT is true which I have found crucial to success) I can see an advantage in trading buy and sell sides separately.
.......If trading multi pair obviously there is a huge difference between a 10pip grid on GBPJPY and EURCHF so yes enabling ATR for grid size and testing to see what works best would make sense.
I haven't modified any code. I have just setup demo ready for this week with one chart long only and one chart short only. I don't see any reason why there would be any system error doing this with the set file I posted. I will report back next week to confirm if this works for me.Haggadah » Sat Jul 02, 2016 12:52 am wrote:
TJF,
Nice idea. I tried this last week by enabling it in the expert panel (long position only) but I only got system error. Since I am not a coder, I cannot proceed further. You might want to share your code.
Haggadah.
Hi,TraderJoeForex » Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:39 pm wrote:I thought I would share a set I am now using live on M5 having played around with lots of different options trying to find something that would act as a slight counterbalance to the way that RnR trades since I am also trading this live.
I settled on M5 Trend Arrow only with 10pip stop and limit grid because it is profitable in it's own right and reacts fast enough to a move to do what I need it to reducing overall drawdown on the account.
I actually got the idea from watching the developments on DottyBot thread where M5 with offsetting looks to be very successful so I thought why not try this on M5 HGBnG. In theory HGI trend arrow should be a better indicator than nonlagDot but who knows until we test.
So far on GJ demo this week HGBnG is ahead of DottyBot but will be interesting to see again after a week. I am also testing versions of both with CSS enabled.
TJF,TraderJoeForex » Wed Jun 29, 2016 3:52 pm wrote:One problem I have though is that the CSS display on chart feedback does not display the CSS values or direction on demo. I have tried reinstalling Empty4 and the EA but the problem remains. Now that I have activated CSS on my Live set file I can see that is working Live.. strangely just not on demo. Anyone else here observed this and/or found the solution?