The Awesome Basket Forward Test

The place for Peaky and Peaky-related stuff.
Post Reply
User avatar
1Direction
Trader
Posts: 97
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2017 8:37 pm
Location: London

The Awesome Basket Forward Test

Post by 1Direction »

TraderJoeForex » Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:28 pm wrote:
Thanks, maybe just try putting 0 for lotsoerdollop and Tradelotsperdollop. That should force 0.01 and then it's back to normal.
Can confirm changes to be effective. The new trades are 0.01 lots.

The current DD is due to 4 short AUDCAD at 0.1 total 0.40 lots -200.52. Under the normal lot size it would be 20.05.
User avatar
TraderJoeForex
Trader
Posts: 1157
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 10:29 pm
Location: South London

The Awesome Basket Forward Test

Post by TraderJoeForex »

1Direction » Tue Oct 17, 2017 8:09 am wrote:
Can confirm changes to be effective.
Great, cheers :)
User avatar
dreambig2
Trader
Posts: 46
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 12:54 am
Location: US

The Awesome Basket Forward Test

Post by dreambig2 »

WhoKnows » Fri Oct 13, 2017 5:04 am wrote: Looking at the set-file I see that in H4PeakHiLo730 MaxPairsAllowed=10 (compared to 50 for the MTF).
Maybe the 10 allocation was filled before any GBPJPY or USDCAD were triggered.
I am seeing some trades on UC over past 24 hours....my GJ showing ranging on the SuperSlopes so no trades at the moment. :)

Edit: GJ trades firing now Tuesday afternoon.
WhoKnows
Trader
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:57 pm
Location: North Brisbane, Australia

The Awesome Basket Forward Test

Post by WhoKnows »

I see that there are 2 public MyFxBook versions of H4PeakHiLo730 running, but the curves look quite different.
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Spyder ... 30/2244589 Looks the best, especially if you would correct the DD spike due to running at 0.1 for a while (while profit taking remained unchanged at a level targeted at 0.01 trades).

http://www.myfxbook.com/members/barry/h ... 30/2257925 looks however different.

It would be interesting to compare both sets to be sure they are identical?
Or is this a broker effect?
barry
Trader
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 5:12 am

The Awesome Basket Forward Test

Post by barry »

WhoKnows » Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:32 pm wrote:I see that there are 2 public MyFxBook versions of H4PeakHiLo730 running, but the curves look quite different.
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Spyder ... 30/2244589 Looks the best, especially if you would correct the DD spike due to running at 0.1 for a while (while profit taking remained unchanged at a level targeted at 0.01 trades).

http://www.myfxbook.com/members/barry/h ... 30/2257925 looks however different.

It would be interesting to compare both sets to be sure they are identical?
Or is this a broker effect?
I only started mine, the 2nd one, on 18 Sep, after the original looked so good, so that explains some or all of the difference. It's a demo account with Global Prime.
User avatar
1Direction
Trader
Posts: 97
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2017 8:37 pm
Location: London

The Awesome Basket Forward Test

Post by 1Direction »

WhoKnows » Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:02 am wrote:I see that there are 2 public MyFxBook versions of H4PeakHiLo730 running, but the curves look quite different.
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Spyder ... 30/2244589 Looks the best, especially if you would correct the DD spike due to running at 0.1 for a while (while profit taking remained unchanged at a level targeted at 0.01 trades).

http://www.myfxbook.com/members/barry/h ... 30/2257925 looks however different.

It would be interesting to compare both sets to be sure they are identical?
Or is this a broker effect?
Attached the set file from the server

EDIT: Uploaded the EA version 1g. I only have the compiled version sent from TJF
EDIT 2: I believe that newer version of the EA do not close global profit baskets which might explain why some have more DD and more open positions
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by 1Direction on Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
WhoKnows
Trader
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:57 pm
Location: North Brisbane, Australia

The Awesome Basket Forward Test

Post by WhoKnows »

barry wrote:I only started mine, the 2nd one, on 18 Sep, after the original looked so good, so that explains some or all of the difference. It's a demo account with Global Prime.
;) Of course I compared both with data sub-sets starting 19 Sep, but I still couldn't explain the difference. They might have different trades at the start, which effected subsequent trades.
But I also tried really hard to compare individual trades in the history. To me it appears that they behave differently.

For example look at the status at this moment:
- one has no open trades, nor open orders. Equity = Balance and it appears it does so most days.
- the other one has 24 open trades and 5 open orders, and it appears to leave most days in DD with open positions.

I forgot; are you both running the same Awesome version? That also might be a difference.
No right or wrong here, but IF there is a difference it may help to find ways toward a decreased DD behaviour.

If you can both put the MQ4 EA files and Set-file here, I'll gladly compare both with a Beyond Compare to find if they are truly identical.

Edit:
I could not find any Awesome 1g MQ4 that 1Direction refers to. Going through the thread 1g was put in post 1 on August 20. Unfortunately one can't compare or read compiled ex files. So if anyone still has a 1g please send it to me.
I really wished the older versions would remain in the thread so you could compare in detail how the code was improved in time. If I find the different version in time, I always love to load them in Beyond Compare and study the differences (which BC will flag in red).

1Direction H4PeakHiLo started Sept 9 with version 1g.
Barry started Sept 19.
I found that by Sept 13 Awesome was already at version 1m, with quite some changes according to information in the thread.
User avatar
1Direction
Trader
Posts: 97
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2017 8:37 pm
Location: London

The Awesome Basket Forward Test

Post by 1Direction »

WhoKnows » Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:09 am wrote:
barry wrote:
Edit:
I could not find any Awesome 1g MQ4 that 1Direction refers to. Going through the thread 1g was put in post 1 on August 20. Unfortunately one can't compare or read compiled ex files. So if anyone still has a 1g please send it to me.
I really wished the older versions would remain in the thread so you could compare in detail how the code was improved in time. If I find the different version in time, I always love to load them in Beyond Compare and study the differences (which BC will flag in red).

1Direction H4PeakHiLo started Sept 9 with version 1g.
Barry started Sept 19.
I found that by Sept 13 Awesome was already at version 1m, with quite some changes according to information in the thread.
I found version 1g in my backup folder see attached. If you ever find out why newer versions do not close at the global profit value then please let me know. I tried pretty much everything possible but not being a coder I've no chances :cry:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
SWG123
Trader
Posts: 565
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 3:02 pm
Location: Cape Town

The Awesome Basket Forward Test

Post by SWG123 »

Hi guys. for what it's worth I'm having no issues whatsoever with global closures (both symbol and basket) using the latest v1q on a live account (Bully Pepperstone). Using H4 PeakHiLo730.set, nice steady profits with low DD.
User avatar
1Direction
Trader
Posts: 97
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2017 8:37 pm
Location: London

The Awesome Basket Forward Test

Post by 1Direction »

SWG123 » Fri Oct 20, 2017 9:17 pm wrote:Hi guys. for what it's worth I'm having no issues whatsoever with global closures (both symbol and basket) using the latest v1q on a live account (Bully Bully Pepperstone). Using H4 PeakHiLo730.set, nice steady profits with low DD.
Great news thanks for sharing. Could you drop your set file please
Post Reply

Return to “Peaky forum”