The New Beast!

[Ribelo]

Fate12,

Check if this the transactions are not CBI, and read my previous post. If you are sure that these are no transactions for the CBI, I will check it.

I have such a question to all, what we do with the CBI module?

On one hand, it ignores the number of open transactions and the amount of currency pairs, but on the other I do not think that could be effective without it. CBI passing through the filter may take too much time and position can open up too late, and when we have too many pairs trade open does't work at all.

[laharjaya]

It's ok for using ea with ootb setting with my 5 digit broker ?

lev. 1:100

[fluegel]

Hi Ribelo,

I think I found a bug with the recent Beast. I don't want to use "Recovery trailing stop" and want recovery trades to be closed like the original Beast (with recovery.break.even.profit.pips 20).
So, I have set
recovery.break.even.profit.pips = 20
use.recover.trailing.stop = false
candle.stick.trailing.stop = false
jumping.trailing.stop = false
auto.calc.rec.var = false
automatic.rts.choice = false
I hope these settings are correct.
However, when the EA tries to modify visible SL, I continue to get an error message, "modify error (1) no error", for ever! It looks like the EA tries to modify SL to the same value even though it has already been modified. I would appreciate it if you could look into this.

fluegel

p.s. As for the CBI module, I have turned it off from the beginning because my broker's leverage is quite low and I don't like the possibility of an unexpected number of new positions opened suddenly.

[Ribelo]

fluegel,

This is somewhat inaccurate Empty4. The robot checks for stoploos is not equal to break even line. On one hand, passes through the "IF", so it is different, on the other hand when you try to change, error pops up, that is identical. It was not a dangerous bug, but I think it has eliminated. Update in first post.

[fluegel]

fluegel,

This is somewhat inaccurate Empty4. The robot checks for stoploos is not equal to break even line. On one hand, passes through the "IF", so it is different, on the other hand when you try to change, error pops up, that is identical. It was not a dangerous bug, but I think it has eliminated. Update in first post.

Thank you for the super quick response, Ribelo!

[alex_forex]

Hi all

Demo EA updated with 03-12-11 version : OK for Monday start



Regards
Alex

[Rascacio]

I think the EA is working as intended.
Read post 1. Only in the case of a whitebox trade, 1.1.2.4 is used for recovery.

fluegel[/quote]

Thanks Fluegel, I must of missed that !!! still I would prefer 1.2.6 or at least the option.

[Ribelo]

laharjaya,

sorry, i missed your post yesterday.

If you have a 5 digit broker, all you have to do is change the spread. My broker is a 4-digit, so is set to 12, you should set to 120.

[380273421]

laharjaya,

sorry, i missed your post yesterday.

If you have a 5 digit broker, all you have to do is change the spread. My broker is a 4-digit, so is set to 12, you should set to 120.

Hi Ribelo, it need a set file?it's over ...why?

[Ribelo]

Your quality modeling is ~ 50%. This means that half of the period in which you tested, did not exist. If you want real results of the backtest, try this http://eareview.net/tick-data.

Here's the result of using ducascopy backtestu tickdata. Modeling quality 99%.