encouraged by the results of the analysis with the sophisticated tool (Trade Advice) described here: viewtopic.php?f=106&t=5536#p164706, I decided to conduct the forwardtest
on one of my accounts, in some past, I set up TDesk with its own entry and exit rules - it's going pretty poorly, but after doing calculations with the Trade Advice it turned out that there are a lot of alternative SL/TP configurations that significantly increase the results
I thought - how can I confirm/verify/materialize these calculations? after all, I can't repeat the history of trades in alternative reality... but wait... I really can't?
so I decided to open a parallel account (call it 'slave') to which I copy every (and only) the entries, but the exits are managed by MPTM only as per the rule of percent of ATR (D1,14) (10% SL, 50% TP) - in this way I should obtain similar results to Trade Advice calculations
so this is how it goes:
snippet of results of the 'master' account (from 23/12/2019): analysis Trade Advice for this period pn 'master' account for the same period (focus on 10%/50% ADR SL/TP): and results of the 'slave' account for the same period (from 23/12/2019): as we can see efects are not even close to the expectations indicated by the Trade Advice - I know there is short time of test, we had Christmas break and markets weren't not usuall, but differences are so huges!
maybe I doing some misintertrepations, maybe I don't understand Trade Advice logic, I'm pretty sure its not because of spread (ICM, raw spread acc. with commision)
anyway, I will continue the test for more weeks and share my results
regards
Q.