ADAPTING NB10.2A FOR LOWER TF & RM TRADING - 10.2A CTS

Place your new trading idea here to see if someone can automate it.
Post Reply
thelearner
Trader
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:35 am

Re: ADAPTING NB10.2A FOR LOWER TF & RM TRADING - 10.2A CTS

Post by thelearner »

AGT wrote:Hi TL - do you have enough computer capacity for loading up the EA on many pairs/charts ? For me the Empty4 platform is nearly frozen ... uploading the Empty4 with the EA sitting on the charts is running for a long time depending on the number of charts/pairs.
It is indeed hard on your PC. I only set it on major pairs for now. But I also use NT RT TMA too so probably this combination is harder on my PC then RJo EA alone.
disbellj

Re: ADAPTING NB10.2A FOR LOWER TF & RM TRADING - 10.2A CTS

Post by disbellj »

Post removed by author.
Last edited by disbellj on Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
coolncalm
Trader
Posts: 173
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 1:09 am

Re: ADAPTING NB10.2A FOR LOWER TF & RM TRADING - 10.2A CTS

Post by coolncalm »

disbellj wrote:Now THIS is a trading strategy. Thank you CC for giving detailed explanation. I am working on EA also. Not as far along with mine, still trying to understand the strategy fully, but if I wasn't such a lousy trader, I could have made pips from the Market Bias and Tma Entry (great pullback entry!) and made about 50 pips so far I think. Instead, I'm in the negative LOL. Hopefully with your great input, my trading situation will soon change for the better.

Thank you!

Don
Hi Don,

I'm glad you like it. :D

Do please share your demo EA too (nice info display), maybe we can quickly iron out any kinks in how the strategy is implemented.

I see you sold eu despite a UT bias. With practice, I'm sure it will click soon for you.

Regarding your questions, the best entry is when ALL the entry conditions have been met including a high edge AND THE TRADE IS IN THE DIRECTION OF THE BIAS (please re-read the strategy).

Cheers,
CC
There's simplicity in every complexity.
disbellj

Re: ADAPTING NB10.2A FOR LOWER TF & RM TRADING - 10.2A CTS

Post by disbellj »

Post removed by author.
Last edited by disbellj on Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:27 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
coolncalm
Trader
Posts: 173
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 1:09 am

Re: ADAPTING NB10.2A FOR LOWER TF & RM TRADING - 10.2A CTS

Post by coolncalm »

disbellj wrote: CC,

I guess what I was trying to say was that I liked the strategy, I see that you go by the "emerging" Bias while making the EA.

our emerging Bias has to do with DP? If so, then DP is really all that's needed IMHO since it overrules earlier rules anyways IMHO.

I'm just using H4P instead of DP, for even earlier entries and exits (stop and reverse). And using Semafors instead of the one you're using just because I get more trades and more profit it would look like. I may be wrong.

I just figured I could get rid of everything except 3 indicators (and one of those is candle color), and basically get better trades IMHO. I wanted your input. I was going to reduce indicators and rules from pic in my last post (which is my first post on the forum BTW :), and go with pic shown with rules I gave in last email.

There are two EAs I made today, first starting with 102.2 CTS, and then simplifying to an extent.

As far as the trades, I took them while coding the EA for 10.2 CTS. Not the first time I've lost money while coding, but hopefully the last. I LEARN the strategy by coding it. So since I haven't learned 10.2 CTS completely (haven't finished reading the PDF), then I have an EA based on the first 2 pages of a 4 page instructions. I'd rather finish the PDF and at least first implementation of rules before giving for testing.

Kindest regards,

Don
Ok. Good luck with your coding. :)
CTS bias definition uses DP, WP & MP because they better represent price behaviour on higher TFs (D1, W, Mn) which then rapidly reflect on lower TFs.
There's simplicity in every complexity.
User avatar
wBear
Trader
Posts: 56
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 5:06 pm
Location: An insignificant small red dot in the world called Singapore

Re: ADAPTING NB10.2A FOR LOWER TF & RM TRADING - 10.2A CTS

Post by wBear »

coolncalm wrote:
RJo wrote:Important fixes added to v1b and v1c, post 1, pg 4:

Removed an old condition that was improperly narrowing the +/-10 pip (default) FastTMALine range for standard entries. In previous versions, I failed to delete it. :oops:

Added FastTMALine/ATeam/Bid returns to DP emerging trend code. As usual, not yet tested. This is a product of both the EA builder software and my manual coding, so please report any problems. It passed inspection by the guy who wrote it. :|

The standard FastPipBuffer input applies also to the FastTMALines for purposes of anticpating the above mentioned emerging trend (again, +/-10 pips by default). However the alert is not displayed until Bid crosses DP.

Notes: The DMPBidDiffsMAs indi is still under construction, but will be added if/when we get meaningful data from it. Changing the ugly alert text to something useful is next on the list.

Happy testing. I'm done for the night.
Great! Testing right away. We should get more trade triggers with the update. Will feed back any developments. Thanks.
Hey guys,
Just to ensure I have total clarity:
Are we testing the EA for alerts only at this point in time? Meaning TradeorAlert=false should remain as false?
fire580
Trader
Posts: 314
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 4:51 pm

Re: ADAPTING NB10.2A FOR LOWER TF & RM TRADING - 10.2A CTS

Post by fire580 »

Under the "How It Works" section of the instructions:

It says under "notes" A UT-RR becomes a UT-R if the DP turns upward - but in the section "With DP between WP & MP it says a UT-RR becomes a UT-R when DP turns upward - is this correct in both instances or maybe only when the DP is in between the WP &MP?
fire580
Trader
Posts: 314
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 4:51 pm

Re: ADAPTING NB10.2A FOR LOWER TF & RM TRADING - 10.2A CTS

Post by fire580 »

RJo - thank you for taking the time to help my understanding of this system/method. :)
disbellj

Re: ADAPTING NB10.2A FOR LOWER TF & RM TRADING - 10.2A CTS

Post by disbellj »

Post removed by author.
Last edited by disbellj on Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:29 pm, edited 6 times in total.
User avatar
coolncalm
Trader
Posts: 173
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 1:09 am

Re: ADAPTING NB10.2A FOR LOWER TF & RM TRADING - 10.2A CTS

Post by coolncalm »

RJo wrote:V1b and v1c in post 1, pg 4 have been updated with:

Alert conditions fixed to match the Trade conditions, and
Meaningful alert text :!:
Hi RJo,

Downloaded and fired up. Your response rate is amazing!!!
Great work, Thanks.

Cheers,
CC
There's simplicity in every complexity.
Post Reply

Return to “Ideas for Possible Automation”