MultiBob, a multi symbol NB10.2(a) autotrader

[Mike]

Hi, great work. Would it be possible to set a "risk" smaller than 1 or something like 1.3? Thanks Mike

[peterke]

Markets don't suit trend traders at the moment as mosts pairs are rangebound. Will nned to wait for some trending behaviour to see how well this can do

rgds

Peter

Thanks Roger

I've heard about Nanningbob several months ago, but frankly never took time to trade with it. Now i am back to the forum. Good to see the inputs from experienced forum members.




Cheers[/quote]

[gustav213]

Guys

How is the performance for last few weeks? I have downloaded the file today, just wanted to know.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. This morning I would say wonderful. Last week I would have said "not so good". Suggest you read the thread and follow the development of this concept. It is my belief that between Paul, NB, Steve and some of the other frequent contributors on this thread something really good is being developed here.
Roger

It comes down to who you ask and you will get different answers. I suggest go through the whole thread it is a hard thing to do but trust me you will learn a lot. I used to hate reading threads but you get a better grasps of what is going on than if you just ask questions.

Right now I have had great results, again I only have a little over a month using MultiBob but my account is over 11% returns and over 1000 pips also. I am using MultiBob v1.1.11

[cmeade2]

It comes down to who you ask and you will get different answers. I suggest go through the whole thread it is a hard thing to do but trust me you will learn a lot. I used to hate reading threads but you get a better grasps of what is going on than if you just ask questions.

Right now I have had great results, again I only have a little over a month using MultiBob but my account is over 11% returns and over 1000 pips also. I am using MultiBob v1.1.11

Gustav

Have you had these results with the EA "right out of the box" or have you adjusted some parameters?

Thanks

cmeade2

[gustav213]

No I did change the settings, and if I think a trade has reached its limit I just go ahead and close it out in profit. Normally by scanning TMA and daily, weekly and monthly pivots everyday to see how the markets are doing.

[matt_32]

Running v1.1.11 - no intervention 10.2a true / 10.2 false
this one seems to be fighting back - started with 25k - balance is 23,235 - open float is +2,036 , so if all was closed now - would be profitable

10.2a false / 10.2 true
taking a beating - started with 25k - balance is 21,340 - open float is +1190 .... not so good

I was wondering what will happen if you trade both 10.2a true and 10.2 true, will it work or there will be a conflict in the code thus some trades cancelling others?

[ross]

Running v1.1.11 - no intervention 10.2a true / 10.2 false
this one seems to be fighting back - started with 25k - balance is 23,235 - open float is +2,036 , so if all was closed now - would be profitable

10.2a false / 10.2 true
taking a beating - started with 25k - balance is 21,340 - open float is +1190 .... not so good

I was wondering what will happen if you trade both 10.2a true and 10.2 true, will it work or there will be a conflict in the code thus some trades cancelling others?

I understand you can make them both true - I just wanted to see the difference without sorting through the statements...

[Baluda]

New version MultiBob v1.2.14 in post 1.
Changes:

• riskPercent user input is now a double, fractional input is possible
• Fixed some issues with CTSBias
• Added CTS emerging bias display variable
• Removed CTS wriggle space display variable

Enjoy,

Paul

[coolncalm]

New version MultiBob v1.2.14 in post 1.
Changes:

• riskPercent user input is now a double, fractional input is possible
• Fixed some issues with CTSBias
• Added CTS emerging bias display variable
• Removed CTS wriggle space display variable

Enjoy,

Paul

Paul,

Great effort! Impressive. Thanks.

I have included more details on how CTS uses the emerging bias that MultiBob displays in the update now posted on the CTS thread.

I feel that with just a little more validation of the data displayed, the EA may soon be ready for demo trading.

Cheers,
CC

[coolncalm]

Hi Paul,

Just aminor point - while testing the display of v1.2.14, I noticed that the CTSEmBias narration may need some tweaking. Most are correct but a couple are not.

On the attached charts, the Emerging Bias reads:

• For AUDUSD: UT-RR instead of DT
• For AUDCHF: UT instead of maybe DT-R (same as CTSBias)
• For GBPAUD: DT-RR instead of UT-R (same as CTSBias)

Please take a look at what may need to be adjusted. Thanks.

Cheers,
CC

EDIT:
Please ignore the post. I have since re-checked the results through other means and found that the displayed Emrging Bias formations are actually all ACCURATE even though the charts do not visually look like those formations were correct.
Great effort, Paul. Impressive.