Believe it or not, but I am not trying to be difficult here.
I am only trying to provide helpful comments based on my experience trading RSI(2).
Albeit my experience might be quite different from what Bob wanted to put into 10.4. And all I am saying is there might be some ambiguity there. Nothing more.
Thanks again for your efforts on this forum.
cmeade2
SteveHopwood wrote:Then why are you weighing in so heavily here?SteveHopwood wrote:cmeade2 wrote:Allison
I don't know the details of Bob's thinking when he put together 10.4. I had only communicated with him on the RSI(2) issues.
On the one hand you sayOn the other you sayI don't know the details of Bob's thinking when he put together 10.4.If you do not understand the rest of it, should you really be commenting about our trades/prospective trades/pending trades/anything other than RSI(2)?I think I understand this system more than you can imagine.
Oh stuff being tactful. This is my forum so I do not always have to be nice to everyone. You appear to be saying that:Dammit, which is it? Get a grip.
- 1) You understand 10.4 better than the rest of us.
2) You only understand RSI(2)
Not that I care. Leaving my ridiculous misunderstanding about breakeven aside (and I at least admit to that piece of bog-basic stupity) 10.4 is pretty basic. Why are you confusing things with your 'I do....erm...I don't....erm....yes I do.....erm" stuff?
If you have nothing useful to say, then stop saying stuff that is not useful.