Multi 10:4 Trader EA

Post Reply
MrLong

Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA

Post by MrLong »

Another way to reduce drawdown, could be to not set STOP orders, but enter the market where a break of the pivots and a closed bar.
User avatar
forextra
Trader
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:34 pm
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA

Post by forextra »

I downloaded the one from the website shown on page 1

You need to download the dll, from here: http://www.mt4gui.com/download/ - 82kb

It was working fine last week - hm!
MrLong

Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA

Post by MrLong »

forextra wrote:I downloaded the one from the website shown on page 1

You need to download the dll, from here: http://www.mt4gui.com/download/ - 82kb

It was working fine last week - hm!
You can click on your Empty4 folder, right click, select properties, select the tab at the top that says Previous Versions, select the one that was working and press the restore button.

ONLY DO THIS IF YOU ARE TRADING A DEMO ACCOUNT.
User avatar
forextra
Trader
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:34 pm
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA

Post by forextra »

You can click on your Empty4 folder, right click, select properties, select the tab at the top that says Previous Versions, select the one that was working and press the restore button.

ONLY DO THIS IF YOU ARE TRADING A DEMO ACCOUNT.

Thanks Andy - will try that.

Keep up the great work.
bubo
Trader
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 7:02 am

Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA

Post by bubo »

MrLong wrote:Another way to reduce drawdown, could be to not set STOP orders, but enter the market where a break of the pivots and a closed bar.
Interesting idea, not sure if it would work because we may be late entering a good move. The advantage of setting a pending order ahead at a line is that you are ignoring noise in the beginning (only enter when there is a good move i the right direction, but if that happens you are in early).

Another thing I noticed that may help reducing DD is the exact way of how we set/remove pending orders. I noticed before how a GBPUSD trade was placed against RSI, and saw that again with XAUUSD this weekend.

I think the issue is that often the RSI will not reach the opposite threshold but will instead reverse back. If that happens, it looks like we are still placing pending orders, even if the RSI is moving against your trading direction. Manually, I would not place pending orders anymore when RSI returns to where it came from. i would remove pending orders and wait until RSI reaches the previous threshold again, and then place pending orders.

The big question is when exactly do we stop placing pending orders, and when do we remove them. I think NanningBob will close open orders and remove pending orders when the RSI drops back into the AO. Are we doing the same with the current EA? Another possibility to reduce DD could be that we only place pending orders when the RSI leaves oversold/overbought and then stop doing it when we enter the opposite half of the panel, or give a second set of thresholds when to turn of pending orders (e.g. not 98/2 but 70/30 or 50/50).
User avatar
glabbeek
Trader
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:09 am
Location: In the middle of the Netherlands

Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA

Post by glabbeek »

bubo wrote:
MrLong wrote:Another way to reduce drawdown, could be to not set STOP orders, but enter the market where a break of the pivots and a closed bar.
Interesting idea, not sure if it would work because we may be late entering a good move. The advantage of setting a pending order ahead at a line is that you are ignoring noise in the beginning (only enter when there is a good move i the right direction, but if that happens you are in early).

Another thing I noticed that may help reducing DD is the exact way of how we set/remove pending orders. I noticed before how a GBPUSD trade was placed against RSI, and saw that again with XAUUSD this weekend.

I think the issue is that often the RSI will not reach the opposite threshold but will instead reverse back. If that happens, it looks like we are still placing pending orders, even if the RSI is moving against your trading direction. Manually, I would not place pending orders anymore when RSI returns to where it came from. i would remove pending orders and wait until RSI reaches the previous threshold again, and then place pending orders.

The big question is when exactly do we stop placing pending orders, and when do we remove them. I think NanningBob will close open orders and remove pending orders when the RSI drops back into the AO. Are we doing the same with the current EA? Another possibility to reduce DD could be that we only place pending orders when the RSI leaves oversold/overbought and then stop doing it when we enter the opposite half of the panel, or give a second set of thresholds when to turn of pending orders (e.g. not 98/2 but 70/30 or 50/50).
I think that you are right about RSI retracting back below the threshold. How I understand Bob's 10.4, those pending orders should be cancelled.

What do you think Andy?
Regards,
Willem-Bram
User avatar
simplex
Trader
Posts: 127
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:21 pm
Location: An insignificant small town close to an insignificant former capital at the Rhine River.

Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA

Post by simplex »

forextra wrote:I downloaded the one from the website shown on page 1

You need to download the dll, from here: http://www.mt4gui.com/download/ - 82kb

It was working fine last week - hm!
forextra,

I'm pretty sure that you have an outdated or corrupt dll version. Should be around 3 MB size - see pic.

simplex
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)
It appears that the Weighted Moving Average was invented by a trader who did not have a firm grasp of filter theory in hopes of reducing lag. (John F. Ehlers)
MrLong

Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA

Post by MrLong »

glabbeek wrote:
bubo wrote:
MrLong wrote:Another way to reduce drawdown, could be to not set STOP orders, but enter the market where a break of the pivots and a closed bar.
Interesting idea, not sure if it would work because we may be late entering a good move. The advantage of setting a pending order ahead at a line is that you are ignoring noise in the beginning (only enter when there is a good move i the right direction, but if that happens you are in early).

Another thing I noticed that may help reducing DD is the exact way of how we set/remove pending orders. I noticed before how a GBPUSD trade was placed against RSI, and saw that again with XAUUSD this weekend.

I think the issue is that often the RSI will not reach the opposite threshold but will instead reverse back. If that happens, it looks like we are still placing pending orders, even if the RSI is moving against your trading direction. Manually, I would not place pending orders anymore when RSI returns to where it came from. i would remove pending orders and wait until RSI reaches the previous threshold again, and then place pending orders.

The big question is when exactly do we stop placing pending orders, and when do we remove them. I think NanningBob will close open orders and remove pending orders when the RSI drops back into the AO. Are we doing the same with the current EA? Another possibility to reduce DD could be that we only place pending orders when the RSI leaves oversold/overbought and then stop doing it when we enter the opposite half of the panel, or give a second set of thresholds when to turn of pending orders (e.g. not 98/2 but 70/30 or 50/50).
I think that you are right about RSI retracting back below the threshold. How I understand Bob's 10.4, those pending orders should be cancelled.

What do you think Andy?
Hi,

The EA should only start placing orders if we have the RSI above/below 98/2 or the AO higher/lower than the zero line, we can delete the orders when the RSI retracting back below the threshold, but if I'm understanding what you saying, thats a point where the EA will start to lay the STOP orders.

We could look at only laying the stops when we have a 123 setup, price breaks the pivot, moves back for the drawdown we could lay the stops at this point.

Just my thoughts, we know the strategy does work, we just need to get the drawdown under control.


Andy
User avatar
forextra
Trader
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:34 pm
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA

Post by forextra »

simplex wrote:
forextra,

I'm pretty sure that you have an outdated or corrupt dll version. Should be around 3 MB size - see pic.

simplex
Thanks Simplex - you are dead right. I uploaded the previous dll. Appreciate all the help that you and everyone on this forum freely give.
Allan
User avatar
rosst
Trader
Posts: 280
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:11 pm
Location: Austin, Texas

Re: Multi 10:4 Trader EA

Post by rosst »

The NZDJPY has 3 open trades on 2 different platforms but 2 of them seem very close - is this according to Bob's rules?

Another thing Bob has mentioned about time is that he will close his positions if in profit:
"I take almost all my profits at: (you probably have heard this before)
Halfway into the Euro session before the USA open
Halfway through the USA session around the Euro close
Between the close of the USA session and Open of JPY session
2-3 hours into the JPY session.

That is usually when a move will hit its peak. By then it has usually moved 1 or 2 lines. I TP and decide if I want to set more pendings, The only time I really do this though is before the USA open, sometimes after the Euro close, especially during a hard move. So be time conscious of these times. In USA EST that is JPY session 10-11 PM EURO 6-7 am USA 10-11 AM and before JPY open 6-7 PM. I never miss those times. Seldom miss the close near a line.
Post Reply

Return to “Nanningbob 10.x”